Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Impeach George W. Bush -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: John Lacelle who wrote (159)	12/14/2000 8:00:03 PM
From: globestocks	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 93284

We should wake up Regan and throw him in jail for supporting Iran, and then the rebels in Nicaragua.

To: John Lacelle who wrote (159)	12/14/2000 8:00:59 PM
From: Oak Tree	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 93284

Lots of special prosecutions could be elected. My question is if Bush is so good why did the market tank all week even though the supreme court made it clear that it was voting for Bush on Saturday? Seems like the market is voting with its feet as well. Not a good sign.

To: John Lacelle who wrote (159)	12/14/2000 8:07:42 PM
From: donjuan_demarco	Read Replies (5) \| Respond to of 93284

"Lets throw Algore in prison first." This is how republicans reach out for unity. The poor guy didn't even win the election, but the republican attack hounds are after him anyway, snarling and growling in the hopes they will get the chance to take a good solid bite out of the democrat's shanks. I will ask my fellow democrats how to respond to this situation. After eight years of being hounded and hunted, of being subject to the republicans' haphazard system of impeachments, confessions and inquisitions, should we give in to the baying, bloodthirsty hounds of hatred who, after all this time, are still thirsting for the blood of our elected officials like rabid pit bulls from hell? Or should we adopt their own methods and insure that the presidency of the usurper is an unmitigated disaster?

To: John Lacelle who wrote (159)	12/14/2000 8:58:49 PM
From: Starowl	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 93284

Excuse me, John. Gore is gone. It's good old boy Dubya's place in the sun, where there's nowhere to hide. It's going to be the Punch and Judy show all over again. His Daddy's boys making the moves. Bet you can't wait for the news conferences, if there are any. I know I can't. And just what in the heck are you going to talk about after January 20th, son? This is going to be sweet. Ooooh, Gore did what with the Russians for the Iranians? What in the heck have you been reading? I think you're confused with, what was that Lt. Col's name, that Marine? North? And who did he work for? You are really, really funny. Not that there is anything wrong with being really, really funny. "in violation of Federal Law"! What a gas! I love ya, John. Really I do. I know you mean well. Yes, let's throw Al Gore in prison, for violating a Federal law. OK? I'll take one arm and you take the other.

To: John Lacelle who wrote (159)	12/14/2000 9:07:33 PM
From: E	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 93284

I think the Gore Chernomyrdin deal deserves more scrutiny, too. It's my impression that nobody has proposed that it was illegal yet, but it seems like at least a mistaken move undertaken in an attempt to shore up segments of the Russian governing elite who seemed most favorably disposed toward the US. But I'm for a full investigation. Do you think there should be an investigation of the apparent conflict of interest in the situation of the outcome of the election being determined by a Supreme Court that included (unrecused) Scalia, with his two Bush-connected sons; Thomas, whose wife is paid by a foundation working for the Republicans specifically on the matter of SC appointments; and Rehnquist and O'Connor, who declared their desire to retire under a Republican administration? No probleme, I'm guessing. Am I right?