Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Ask Michael Burke -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Knighty Tin who wrote (86911)	12/15/2000 12:13:36 AM
From: Lee39	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 132070

WSJ mentioned Fred Hickey's analysis of Intel Capital interactive.wsj.com "the portfolio's decline "is far worse than the Nasdaq's" because many of Intel's positions are in the hard-hit Internet and communications areas"

To: Knighty Tin who wrote (86911)	12/15/2000 1:05:51 AM
From: Spekulatius	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 132070

Comment's about your closed end funds: Thai Capital has a 4.4% expense ratio - TLV seems like a better choice with a 2.2% expense ratio and less weighting in telecom. The Germany fund and the New Germany fund are quite different - GER is blue chips and the New Germany fund more the "Mittelstand" companies.

To: Knighty Tin who wrote (86911)	12/15/2000 8:29:04 AM
From: Earlie	Read Replies (7) \| Respond to of 132070

MB and Gang: I've been up to my ears in work of late and have not had a chance to join the thread. Fortunately, I am going to take some time off for the next while, so will be able to participate more actively over the holidays. Here are a few observations that might be helpful to some of our group. Back in August, following an intensive summer field research effort, I posted a piece (#83134) that forecast an extremely ugly autumn for the tech sector. In that post, I provided a number of observations that backed my dour view. Unfortunately for the vast majority of investors, that set of predictions proved accurate and we have experienced a severe contraction in tech stock valuations. While I am delighted that the forecasts I made at that time proved accurate, I am truly sorry to see the carnage that the market's contraction has inflicted on the majority of retail investors. Yes, one could argue that they got what they deserved for driving share prices into never-never land, but there is little solace to be taken as one watches much of the continent's already meager savings get wiped out. Today, many retail investors are convinced that we are at or are very close to a "bottom". The field evidence suggests that this is but wishful thinking. I can see absolutely nothing to suggest any respite from the marauding bear. Back in August, while the posted "worry list" was extensive, the key points revolved around an intensifying recession spreading across Asia, a "Fed" that refused to turn off the money printing presses, and above all else, a relentless expansion of tech sector inventories. Finished goods piled to the ceilings as well as the incredibly stupid triple ordering and hoarding of semi products by manufacturers (remember the supposed "shortage of semis" story that was promulgated by every N./Y. based analyst during the summer?) provided ample evidence that we were in for trouble this past fall, especially with corporate sales having fallen off the graph and the consumer finally cutting back on his manic borrowing. Unfortunately, inventories are now in much worse shape than they were last summer. This autumn's selling season has been lackluster and the all-important Christmas sales period has been disappointing. It is now inevitable that tech-related inventories will be at record levels as we move into the early winter sales doldrums. For quite some time, I have pounded away at the point that the PC market was saturated. In August, I noted that the cell/digital phone market was also approaching saturation. For any who might wish to question those observations, I can only say go visit some stores or distributors. And since PCs and cell phones soak up most of the semi products, to whom do all those still over-valued semi manufacturers sell their products? Near a "bottom"? Not by a long shot. Most funds, as well as the general investing public are now trapped as a result of massive over-ownership of tech stocks. Tech sector earnings have been artificially inflated as a result of "aggressive" (in some cases, fraudulent) accounting, as well as through the sale of dot com investments. Both of these unseemly practices are coming under pressure, just as actual earnings are being crushed. The tech sector must wade through several quarters worth of ugly "warnings", nasty financial results and considerable contraction and consolidation before a bottom will be found. In the end, profitability still defines stock prices. Real profits have been a rarity in many tech companies (as most have been forced to spend sums that far exceed their free cash flows on never-ending research and capital equipment investment, just to stay in the game). Saturation of addressed markets is just beginning to extract a toll, which in the end will be much worse than most investors can conceptualize. The tech sector bear is in its infancy. Incidentally, have a good look at the optical stocks. They are about to take it in the neck as the public comes to recognize that the build-out of optical networks was vastly over done. and that the growth in this sector is coming to an end. Also examine the "contract manufacturers". What happens to their growth as their contracts get cut back dramatically this winter? Most operate on minuscule margins. Their fixed costs are large. Most will find it difficult to reduce their operating costs to align with their plunging order books. Their PEs will be stripped near term. Best, Earlie