To: chalu2 who wrote (116890 ) 12/16/2000 1:49:34 PM From: TH Respond to of 769670 chalu2, You have made an interesting point. I think it is all to easy for Republicans and Democrats to lump and label, incorrectly I might add, each other in a specific camp. A more accurate grouping might be that X percent (lets say 75%) from both parties don't have a specific agenda. Lets say that the remaining 12.5% from each party have a very specific agenda (it might not be the same agenda and may in fact be at completely opposite ends of that specific parties spectrum). The trouble is that this 12.5% is involved in moving the party while the others don't take an active interest. This creates, at least in my opinion, a gross misrepresentation of the will of the majority in each party. I think Tide is saying that he sees socialist overtones, beyond those of conventional Democratic policy, in some of the recent leadership. The people we can see are moving in that direction. Conversely, lefties see us righties as more religious and gun-crazy. Of course both of these broad views do not reflect the actual position of the majority in each party. As for recruiting activities, well I ask, whats in a name? Black is white if you can get enough people to believe it. Free press would have stopped Hitler, and that is exactly why I oppose almost all gun laws. Anyway, I agree with what you are saying, and that is that 50 million people did not vote for a Socialist. They voted for someone that has some ideas that happen to be similar to those of a party long dead in this country called the Socialist. I don't know what they call themselves now, but they are still out there and they are a lot more clever. HAGO TH