Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: biostruggle who wrote (90848)	12/27/2000 10:53:22 PM
From: Ingenious	Respond to of 152472

I heard the cure for brain cancer is strapping old analog phones around your head and having an automatic dialer call the phones in a round-robin fashion for 8 hours/day. The next suit will be against car companies for exposing us to toxins emitted from car fumes; perhaps this guy will go after power lines and trace elements of minerals in the water. Clearly, this is a frivolous suit backed by someone who received $1B of "investment" money. He probably figures he can invest another $100M and make another billion. I hope this case gets thrown out and the lawyer behind it gets slapped with sanctions (and a string of cell phones around his head to boot). My solution: 1. put a label on the phone "Phones may cause brain cancer" 2. Tell people not to use cellphones. 3. Invite the same people not to leave their homes as they might get hurt.

To: biostruggle who wrote (90848)	12/28/2000 9:04:36 AM
From: Jim Dudl	Respond to of 152472

There were two very recent articles in good medical journals that confirm a large literature that there is no proof of handheld cellular telephones causing brain cancer. You never know what a court will decide, but at least the literature is on the side of no cause. JAMA 2000 Dec 20;284(23):3001-7 Related Articles, Books, LinkOut Handheld cellular telephone use and risk of brain cancer. Muscat JE, Malkin MG, Thompson S, Shore RE, Stellman SD, McRee D, Neugut AI, Wynder EL American Health Foundation, 1 Dana Rd, Valhalla, NY 10595. jmuscat2@earthlink.net. CONTEXT: A relative paucity of data exist on the possible health effects of using cellular telephones. OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that using handheld cellular telephones is related to the risk of primary brain cancer. DESIGN AND SETTING: Case-control study conducted in 5 US academic medical centers between 1994 and 1998 using a structured questionnaire. PATIENTS: A total of 469 men and women aged 18 to 80 years with primary brain cancer and 422 matched controls without brain cancer. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Risk of brain cancer compared by use of handheld cellular telephones, in hours per month and years of use. RESULTS: The median monthly hours of use were 2.5 for cases and 2.2 for controls. Compared with patients who never used handheld cellular telephones, the multivariate odds ratio (OR) associated with regular past or current use was 0.85 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.6-1.2). The OR for infrequent users (<0. 72 h/mo) was 1.0 (95% CI, 0.5-2.0) and for frequent users (>10.1 h/mo) was 0.7 (95% CI, 0.3-1.4). The mean duration of use was 2.8 years for cases and 2.7 years for controls; no association with brain cancer was observed according to duration of use (P =.54). In cases, cerebral tumors occurred more frequently on the same side of the head where cellular telephones had been used (26 vs 15 cases; P =.06), but in the cases with temporal lobe cancer a greater proportion of tumors occurred in the contralateral than ipsilateral side (9 vs 5 cases; P =.33). The OR was less than 1.0 for all histologic categories of brain cancer except for uncommon neuroepitheliomatous cancers (OR, 2.1; 95% CI, 0.9-4.7). CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that use of handheld cellular telephones is not associated with risk of brain cancer, but further studies are needed to account for longer induction periods, especially for slow-growing tumors with neuronal features. 1: Lancet 2000 Nov 25;356(9244):1837-40 Related Articles, Books Epidemiological evidence on health risks of cellular telephones. Rothman KJ Epidemiology Research Institute, Newton Lower Falls, MA 02462-1450, USA. KRothman@aol.com It is too soon for a verdict on the health risks from cellular telephones, especially in view of changing technology. From the Interphone project and some other large studies in progress, better information may emerge. Based on the epidemiological evidence available now, the main public-health concern is clearly motor vehicle collisions, a behavioural effect rather than an effect of radiofrequency exposure as such. Neither the several studies of occupational exposure to radiofrequencies nor the few of cellular telephone users offer any clear evidence of an association with brain tumours or other malignancies. Even if the studies in progress were to find large relative effects for brain cancer, the absolute increase in risk would probably be much smaller than the risk stemming from motor vehicle collisions. Cellular telephones affect the quality of our lives in myriad ways, for good and ill; the health risk is just one part of a picture that is slowly coming into focus. PMID: 11117928, UI: 21004006

To: biostruggle who wrote (90848)	12/28/2000 9:05:38 AM
From: Harvey Rosenkrantz	Respond to of 152472

The association has not been proven, much less causation. This is another instance of pseudoscience promulgated for the courtroom. The link between lung cancer (and other diseases) and cigarette smoking has been irrefutably established since at least the mid 1960's. The shame of the smoking situation is that it has taken so long for the public, legislatures and legal system to penetrate the fog produced by the tobacco industry.

To: biostruggle who wrote (90848)	12/28/2000 9:09:04 AM
From: Boplicity	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 152472

If I'm not mistaken but CDMA based phones have the lowest emissions. Furthermore, there has been study after study, not one has found a direct link to brain tumors. G

To: biostruggle who wrote (90848)	12/28/2000 11:48:42 AM
From: vc21	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 152472

New lawsuits coming. Throwing cell phones at other people could kill them. This casts a very dark litigious cloud over the entire sector. Maybe Marvin will get his buy back price on this down move.

To: biostruggle who wrote (90848)	12/28/2000 4:07:07 PM
From: cfoe	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 152472

If I'm not mistaken isn't Verizon a CDMA carrier. It is also a very large analog carrier, which is the system used in all that tests I have heard of; which tests have not proven any link. But anyone can sue anyone else in this day and age. Too bad the plaintiffs' lawyers cannot be held liable for anything if they lose. As a case in point, in SF a mother has just filed sued against the SF Ballet school under the SF anti-discrimination law because the school rejected her daughter for the school for having the wrong body type.