Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Right Wing Extremist Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Mr. Whist who wrote (3813)	1/30/2001 10:23:19 AM
From: PROLIFE	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 59480

I see in another news piece that a lot of your "brothers and sisters" are going to be looking for jobs....Chrysler says what, 20,000 or so?

To: Mr. Whist who wrote (3813)	1/30/2001 11:19:09 AM
From: Zoltan!	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 59480

>>So it comes as no surprise to me that the newspaper took the tone that it did, even in a straight news story, as opposed to an opinion piece. There was no "other side of the story" presented in this unbalanced piece. That was an editorial. It will take much to make unions somewhat clean after their partnership with the Dems in Corruption Inc. Hopefully the law will see to that. Now that the law is back in town. The piece makes clear that the unholy alliance between corrupt Dems and corrupt union leaders did nothing to stem union decline, now just 9% of the non-governmental work force. Which means that less than 5% of workers are union members voluntarily. Hopefully too, the Bush Administration will reinstitute the Taft-Hartley reforms that Clinton undid in turning back the clock to the bad old days of widespread union corruption.