SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : John Pitera's Market Laboratory -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Terry Whitman who wrote (3284)2/21/2001 9:23:59 AM
From: John Pitera  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 33421
 
1233- I didn't realize the recent low was that close to the 1999 low. yes I know it's interesting.

the 1998 lows are possible but I think that would be more of a 2002 development, and it's not mandated that
we go back to the 1998 lows in the SPX. (from my elliott perspective.) I would think that we make a low
in the NASD and the SPX in early March and then have a rally into the summer.

2199 is the interesting number on the NASD, from my vantage point. I wrote that up in Dec on this thread.

here is my Dec 20th post

Message 15061994

geocities was down when I hit the url for it's link,

so this url should show the NASD set up.

piteraperspectives.com

Gold has had the lowest percentage of bulls (13%) on marketvane last week, this matches the low in bullish
sentiment that we reached in sept 1999 right before that explosive 25% + rally. The commercials are
also heavily long so we really should rally. The Barron's article that I posted here on Gold was also
incredibly bearish, so I would also think we rallied.

Prechter sent out a free report this weekend talking about Gold and that's been his best market the last 20
years. he points out this evidence and that we could still go to 200 with this bullish technical picture,
much in the same fashion that the Nasd bubble, kept going up when all the evidence said it should not.

the USD and it's relative strength @ 113 (especially the fact that it's not already down to 105 or lower on the USD
Index) has to figure into the gold calculus.