Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Scumbria who wrote (128934)	3/3/2001 10:56:12 AM
From: Dan3	Read Replies (6) \| Respond to of 186894

Great opportunities on returned/refurbished P4 systems from Dell. 110 out of 266 pages are P4's. Which would seem to indicate that 41% of returned systems are P4s. Has Dell ever indicated what percentage of their sales during the past few months have been P4 systems? You don't suppose that some buyers have felt let down by "netburst" do you? Intel told everyone P4 would "enrich" their internet experience. Is it possible that the P4 didn't speed up their dial up modem connections as the Intel advertisments seemed to promise it would? That ad program isn't backfiring on Intel, is it? outlet.dell.com

To: Scumbria who wrote (128934)	3/4/2001 8:02:56 AM
From: pgerassi	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 186894

Dear Scumbria: Clinton and the Democrats wanted to overspend. Every time Clinton had his way, he spent more. Your vaunted 1993 deficit reduction act was really 90% tax increases and 10% spending reductions mostly in the out years. We cannot sustain government spending increases of 8% a year when growth in the economy is less than half that. Bush proposes 4% a year in his budget being sent up. That is half of the increase in Clinton's first two years when he had a Democratic Congress to go along. Besides, I blame Congress for overspending and reducing spending. They took that power away from the President during the Nixon years. The President can now only suggest a budget and he can only vote up or down on what Congress passes. Clinton's years were marked by vetoes every time Congress did not pass a budget that spent enough for him. I think that Bush will be the other way. His father and Reagan did try to hold the line on spending (but the Congress could always override it (you seem to forget this major fact all of the time (the last word is where the "buck" stops))). His father did get the spending caps that when kept, balanced the budget. It seems that Republican Presidents hand Democratic ones economies in good shape and Democrats return economies in or near to a recession. Pete