SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: fingolfen who wrote (129941)3/14/2001 3:51:34 PM
From: THE WATSONYOUTH  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 186894
 
Ahhh, I see, so you're setting up a straw-man to win the argument. The 1.0GHz K7 has been available for a year whereas the P4 in any speed grade has only been around for 5 months. 1.2GHz K7 vs. 1.3-1.5GHz P4 is quite a bit fairer and covers the same time frame.

My earlier post specified in the last six months. But, use whatever time frame you want. Let's even give it several
more months. Are you planning a P4 upgrade soon??? Ha! LOL!
I just find it pretty strange that no one (that I recall) on this thread has come forth (in ANY preceding discussion) so far and admitted buying a P4..... No more/no less.

THE WATSONYOUTH



To: fingolfen who wrote (129941)3/14/2001 4:05:28 PM
From: Scumbria  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
Fin,

Here is an exchange I had with Paul about 18 months ago, which sums up a lot of my views.

To:Paul Engel who wrote (80178)
From: Scumbria Wednesday, Nov 17, 1999 12:33 AM
View Replies (4) | Respond to of 134576

Paul,
Re:"Why is Intel's Coppermine BETTER and FASTER than AMD 's AthWIPE ?"

I've been explaining this to you for 2 years now. Memory latency is critical for many benchmarks, including SPEC. The low latency L2 on Coppermine gives it a big advantage over Athlon.

Unfortunately for Intel, low latency CPU functions tend to limit clock speed. Is this the case with Coppermine?


Message 11959366

Scumbria