Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Dave B who wrote (67809)	3/15/2001 4:56:50 PM
From: charred water	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 93625

20 claims independent of "bus" definition. The Infineon suit references 4 patents, as found at: rambusite.com The U.S. patent numbers are: 5953263 5954804 6032214 6034918 I have searched the claims for any reference to the word bus. I am not a lawyer, and so, I have provided links to the information so you can inspect the claims and check my count. In the worst possible interpretation of the meaning of "bus" in the claims, what would be left? For US05953263, delphion.com 33 claims; 13 use "bus", 20 don't use "bus"(claims: 1, 4-13, 18-26) For US05954804, delphion.com 26 claims; 26 use "bus", 0 don't use "bus" For US06032214, delphion.com 37 claims; 37 use "bus", 0 don't use "bus" For US06034918, delphion.com 38 claims; 38 use "bus", 0 don't use "bus" So, by my count, 20 claims survive the worst case decision of the court. In my opinion, these claims DO represent IP that is used in both SDRAM and DDR. Remember, it's not a ball game, so don't score the claim count. A single claim may represent infringement by the defendant. For example, the most general claim that does not depend on the definition of "bus" is US05953263, claim 1: "A synchronous semiconductor memory device having at least one memory section which includes a plurality of memory cells, the memory device comprises: a programmable register to store a value which is representative of a delay time after which the memory device responds to a read request." - Greg

To: Dave B who wrote (67809)	3/15/2001 4:58:32 PM
From: Bilow	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 93625

Hi Dave B; Jdaasoc pointed out the interoperability problems with RDRAM. You were unable to recognize them for what they were because you're a moron. Arguing about it is pointless, though maybe you should go tell Jdaasoc about your opinions on the subject, if you can find him. I would guess that most of the investors in this stock have other things on their mind right now. -- Carl P.S. My guess is that he will call you a "semantic goofball", for denying that the OR840 problems fall under that category.