Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : MDA - Market Direction Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: KymarFye who wrote (72428)	3/16/2001 11:39:03 PM
From: Zeev Hed	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 99985

Kymar, if you would have waited for that fanfare in August 1992, you would have missed that silent bottom completely. No congressional hearings, nothing every one resigned to the fact that stocks are the last thing tio invest in (of course, you could get 30 years treasuries then at $13 to 15%, why bother with the market?). I still think that w are going to be "treated" to a mutiyear period of a market gyrating between broad ranges in a series of three may be four bear markets interrupted with vey lively bull periods, but no real "progress" a la "fool" (where are the next 2000 Naz point going to be, that was their story last year as well). You'll have to chose the right stocks and you'll have to do the best yo can with timing. Zeev

To: KymarFye who wrote (72428)	3/17/2001 12:55:35 PM
From: Mike M	Respond to of 99985

Funny piece. ;o) I see you still want to underestimate Bush. That is OK. Worked for me for eight years with Clinton. He still disappointed me but I never had to reconsider my perception. This "Clinton recession" appears still in its infancy. Let's leave him completely out of the solution. I guess I would prefer to resolve the mess this way and keep all the politicians out of the solution since none of them have ever understood the problem: Message 15513589