SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : BS Bar & Grill - Open 24 Hours A Day -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Ilaine who wrote (986)3/23/2001 1:08:41 AM
From: Tom Clarke  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 6901
 
Maybe if we called it "rescuing" rather than "looting," it'd be acceptable.

My sister e-mailed this to me

This is really amazing!!!
ONLY IN AMERICA
A Charlotte, NC man purchased a box of very rare and expensive cigars and
then insured them against fire among other things. Within a month having
smoked his entire stockpile of these great cigars and without yet having
made even his first premium payment on the policy, the man filed a claim
against the insurance company. In his claim, the man stated the cigars were
lost "in a series of small fires." The insurance company refused to pay,
citing the obvious reason: that the man had consumed the cigars in the
normal fashion. The man sued....  and won!
In delivering the ruling the judge agreed with the insurance company that
the claim was frivolous. The Judge stated nevertheless, that the man held a
policy from the company in which it had warranted that the cigars were
insurable and also guaranteed that it would insure them against fire,
without defining what is considered to be "unacceptable fire," and was
obligated to pay the claim.
Rather than endure a lengthy and costly appeal process, the insurance
company accepted the ruling and paid $15,000.00 to the man for his loss of
the rare cigars lost in the "fires."
So what would you decide to do as the insurance company?
Here is what they did.

NOW FOR THE BEST PART

After the man cashed the check, the insurance company had him arrested on
24 counts of ARSON!!!! With his own insurance claim and testimony from the
previous case being used against him, the man was convicted of
intentionally burning his insured property and sentenced him to 24 months
in jail and $24,000.00 fine.
(This is a true story and was the 1st place winner in the recent Criminal
Lawyers Darwin Award Contest). >>