SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : The Critical Investing Workshop -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: bonnuss_in_austin who wrote (35117)3/31/2001 12:32:30 AM
From: abuelita  Respond to of 35685
 
The pink slips at Nortel and Cisco represent a fraction of cuts made by other companies in the last decade:

China Telecommunications Corp. Jobs eliminated: 200,000
Announced: August 2,000
Why: Restructuring. China's telecommunications sector was hit hard after the government split the telecom monopoly into four companies.

IBM Corp. Jobs eliminated: 85,000
Announced: July 1993
Why: A massive restructuring program led to the early retirement of 50,000 employees followed by a gradual phasing out of 35,000 jobs. By 1994, after several years of downsizing, IBM's total workforce was about 200,000, down from a peak of 406,000 in 1985

General Motors Corp. Jobs eliminated: 74,000
Announced: December 1991
Why: To restore the financial health of its North American operations, GM closed 21 plants and cut 74,000 jobs, including 9,000 in its home state of Michigan

Sears, Roebuck & Co. Jobs eliminated: 50,000
Announced: January 1993
Why: Phasing out of catalogues due to high costs.

AT&T Corp. Jobs eliminated: 34,000
Announced: January 1996
Why: The telecommunications giant originally cut 40,000 positions when it split into three companies. However, a voluntary buyout package and an eventual rehiring of 6,000 workers softened the blow.

Boeing Company. Jobs eliminated: 27,000
Announced: February 1993
Why: The world's leading airplane builder cut back production after carriers like United Airlines and Japan Airlines delayed on cancelled orders.

DaimlerChrysler AG Jobs eliminated: 26,000
Announced: February 2001
Why: Restructuring. To get the company back on its feet, chairman Jürgen Schrempp is unveiling new products - revamped models of Jeep Liberty, Dodge Viper and Durango.

Unilever Jobs eliminated: 25,000
Announced: February 2000
Why: Unilever divisions sold off 1,400 brands in order to focus on their 400 top sellers.

Nortel Networks Corp. Jobs eliminated: 10,000
Announced: February 2001
Why: Nortel announced its earnings would fall short of forecasts. Its share price plunged 30% taking down other companies in the sector

Cisco Systems Inc. Jobs eliminated: 8,000
Announced: March 2001
Why: In a move to cut costs after missing its first revenue-growth target in seven years, Cisco announced a plan to slash 16% of its workforce.

Taken from Report on Business Magazine, April issue.



To: bonnuss_in_austin who wrote (35117)3/31/2001 8:05:35 AM
From: Poet  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 35685
 
A brief read on the quarter, from today's Noo Yawk Times:

March 31, 2001

A Gloomy Quarter Ends, and Investors Look
Ahead

By ALEX BERENSON

ne of Wall Street's longest winters ever
finally ended yesterday, as investors
closed a miserable quarter with a muted rally.

Three months ago, the mood on Wall Street
was guardedly optimistic. After plunging
through the fall, the market as a whole
seemed reasonably valued, if not exactly
cheap.

Optimistic strategists like Abby Joseph
Cohen of Goldman, Sachs expected the market to rebound solidly in 2001. And
when the Federal Reserve unexpectedly cut short-term interest rates on Jan. 3 by
one-half percentage point in an effort to stimulate growth, investors bought stocks
with abandon, pushing the Nasdaq composite index up 14.2 percent for the day.

But the rally soon fizzled, even though the Fed cut rates a second time on Jan. 31.
By the end of February, stocks were lower than they had been before the Fed's first
rate cut. March brought further declines.

"Every strategist on the street, including myself, put together a table of how stocks
do 12 months after the first rate cut," said Ed Yardeni, chief investment strategist at
Deutsche Banc Alex. Brown. "Then we did it after the second cut. Then we did it
after the third. And while we were putting out this happy news, stocks kept going
down."

The market's problems reflect the weakness in the economy, which has slowed to a
crawl after years of strong growth. Information technology companies, which led the
boom, have been hardest hit, with many posting weaker-than-expected earnings and
layoffs.

With no end to the slowdown in sight, investors are shedding the technology and
telecommunications stocks they wanted so desperately for most of the 1990's.

After falling more than half from its peak last March, the Nasdaq composite index
dropped another 25.5 percent this quarter, losing 630.26 points to close at
1,840.26. (Yesterday, the Nasdaq gained 19.69 points, or 1.1 percent.) It was the
fourth-worst quarter ever for the Nasdaq. The worst was last fall, when the index
fell 32.7 percent.

"This was one of the ugliest quarters we've seen in a long time," said John Morosani,
manager of the $240 million ING Barings Furman Selz small-cap value fund. "What
you really saw was the unwinding of all the excesses that were put in place in 1998,
1999 and the first months of 2000."

Individual technology stocks, even market leaders like Cisco Systems, have been
even harder hit. Cisco shares dropped another 59 percent for the quarter and are
now down more than four-fifths from their peak last March, wiping out more than
$400 billion in shareholder wealth. Cisco closed yesterday at $15.81, up 56 cents.

Broader market indexes also suffered this winter, although not as badly. The
Standard & Poor's 500 index lost 159.95 points, or 12.1 percent, to finish the
quarter at 1,160.33. The drop put the index into a bear market for the first time
since at least 1987. (Wall Street generally defines a bear market as a prolonged fall
of 20 percent or more in a major index; there is some debate whether the October
1987 crash qualifies, since stocks began to rebound almost immediately after their
plunge.)

The Dow Jones industrial average, which is less weighted to technology than the
other major indexes, showed the most strength. The Dow lost 908.07 points, or 8.4
percent, to close the quarter at 9,878.78, on top of its 6.2 percent loss last year.
(The Dow rose 79.72 points, or 0.8 percent, yesterday, while the S.& P. 500
picked up 12.38 points, or 1.1 percent.)

In a surprising exception to the woes of many technology stocks, Microsoft was
the Dow's strongest component for the quarter. Microsoft rose 26.1 percent, after
losing 63 percent last year, as investors grew more optimistic about the company's
chances for resolving its antitrust battle. Other winners included Philip Morris, the
tobacco and food giant, which rose 7.8 percent, on top of a 91 percent gain last
year.

Despite this quarter's problems, many strategists remain optimistic that the market is
overdue for a rebound. The Fed's rate cuts are certain to help the economy
eventually, and on a price-earnings basis, the overall market is no longer expensive,
the bulls say. Even some longtime bears have begun to change their stance.

"The market looks a lot better under the surface than it does upfront," said Christine
A. Callies, the chief American investment strategist for Merrill Lynch. She noted that
many stocks actually bottomed in the fall, and that the stocks of companies whose
fates are closely tied to economic growth have already begun to rally. Their gains
show that the worst of the slowdown may be over and that some investors are
anticipating a recovery, Ms. Callies said.

"In the first few months of a Fed policy change, not everybody thinks it will work,"
Ms. Callies said. "I don't think that the turn the market wants to see is very far away.
I think there should be a sustainable rally in the second quarter."

Then again, lots of investors thought that about the first quarter, too.

Treasury Prices Rise By Reuters

Treasury bond prices rose yesterday as a report showing manufacturing activity in
the Chicago area sank to 19-year lows in March as separate reports showed
consumer confidence and spending remaining resilient.

"I think that the Chicago data is going to suggest to a lot of people that the Federal
Reserve is going to have to act more aggressively again and doesn't have time to
waste," said Kim Rupert, senior economist at Standard & Poor's MMS.

The 10-year Treasury note rose 2132, to a price of 1002332. The note's yield,
which moves in the opposite direction from the price, fell to 4.90 percent from 4.99
percent on Thursday.

The price of the 30-year Treasury bond rose 2132, to 983032. The bond's yield fell
to 5.44 percent from 5.49 percent on Thursday.



To: bonnuss_in_austin who wrote (35117)3/31/2001 6:24:48 PM
From: robwin  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 35685
 
Hi everyone,

Some of you may have read this post made by KG4 on Voltaire's moderated thread:

Message 15593466

Some people have sent me messages asking if am the attorney who contacted KG4. I can advise that i am not, nor have I been consulted about it.

I can say that I am aware that such litigation is allegedly being contemplated but I do not have any specifics...if true, it would be a very interesting case...Some of the individuals supposedly involved relied not only public posts setting forth specific investment "advice" but had also had personal interaction before and after the famous or perhaps infamous, "Porch Party"...what can it all mean? hmm...