SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : ahhaha's ahs -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: ahhaha who wrote (2096)4/21/2001 8:32:41 PM
From: AhdaRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 24758
 
We have a brand new economy that is fizzling and Old Economy that is running out of energy. It is going to be a brutal summer if is hot here especially in outlying areas where the cost of housing is less but the cost of air conditioning can possibly double.

I think about people living in Palm Dale and more distant areas of the San Fernando Valley. It costs more for people to drive into LA to work due to gas, then there are companies who are trying to cut costs and will try to freeze wages while all the standard costs to the consumer are increasing.

www0.mercurycenter.com

Posted at 9:38 p.m. PDT Friday, April 20, 2001

Energy hit could plunge state into recession
Study warns of blow this summer to already slowing economy
BY JENNIFER BJORHUS
Mercury News

Rolling blackouts and rising energy costs this summer could deliver a $17 billion blow to California, while slowing Bay Area job growth by 5,000 jobs a year and possibly tipping a decelerating state economy into recession, a new study warns.

That bleak forecast was released Friday by the Bay Area Economic Forum in the first analysis of the potential financial toll of California's thickening power quagmire. The report was prepared by the national consulting firm of McKinsey & Co.

The price tag does not include the $73 million a day the state is now spending to buy electricity. The analysis, being sent to Gov. Gray Davis, lawmakers in Sacramento and state and federal utilities officials, focuses exclusively on how rising energy costs and blackouts will affect the Bay Area and the state, and how to fix the problem.

The numbers in the report suggest the energy crisis could harm the state's economy worse than the so-called ``Asian flu'' of 1997-98, when tech exports to Pacific Rim nations slumped dramatically.

Among the report's highlights:

Electricity rate hikes and increased costs passed on by businesses will cut disposable income in the Bay Area, which currently exceeds $250 billion a year, by more than $1 billion this year, the report estimates.

Of the local businesses surveyed for the report, 42 percent reported that energy problems already have lowered their profit margins. A 50 percent increase in electricity rates means Bay Area businesses stand to lose $500 million in output.

Blackouts -- the most serious energy threat -- could cost Bay Area companies $1 billion to $5 billion in lost output this summer, reducing the region's annual growth rate by as much as 1 percent.
The power woes come after a big reality check for the Bay Area's overall wealth.

The plunge this year in stock option income, for instance, may well take a bigger bite out of Bay Area disposable income than higher electricity bills. Experts predict stock option income in California -- which hit $84 billion last year -- will plunge this year by at least 25 percent -- or at least $21 billion.

Nonetheless, the power conundrum ``presents an enormous threat to the economic welfare of the Bay Area,'' the report concludes.

Statewide slowdown

``These are very very significant figures,'' said Bay Area Economic Forum President R. Sean Randolph in an interview, ``especially when you add it to an economy that's very perceptibly slowing.''

The statewide picture isn't any better.

This year, California's economy was expected to grow 3.5 percent. Because of the anticipated summer blackouts, that growth could fall to 3.35 percent or 2.5 percent or lower.

A slowdown of 1 percent in the state's growth is a big hit -- bigger than the 1997-98 Asia financial crisis, which was responsible for less than a half percent drop in the state's economic growth, experts say.

The report's sponsors say that problems such as rising inflation, labor shortages or even the collapse of a foreign market usually don't reduce growth by more than 1 percent.

``The dimensions they're talking about are realistic,'' said Fred Furlong, an economist at the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco who reviewed the report. ``The impact could parallel that which we saw with the Asian flu.''

The energy crisis, Furlong said, is dovetailing with a crashed stock market that's eaten into personal income and a broad slowdown in technology spending that will take at least six months to play out.

Free-market approach

As for solutions, the analysis calls for a free-market approach and swift action to fix the flaws in California's energy deregulation scheme. The study makes no mention of efforts to ask the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to affix price caps on sky-high wholesale electricity prices.

The report also questions the state's wisdom in buying electricity transmission lines from the utilities, calling it a ``stop-gap'' measure.

Instead, the McKinsey report urges the state to simplify the process for building new generation and for selling it, and to build better incentives for reducing power demands at home and at work. The most urgent of the issues is better conservation, said Sunne McPeak, president of the Bay Area Council. ``We've got to go beyond where we are right now for demand management for the summer months,'' McPeak said.

The state may need to somehow enforce mandatory reductions in energy use not unlike the water-use rules cities adopted during California's drought years, she said.

Solving the entire problem, of course, will require approaches on all fronts.

``This is not next September we move to a new story,'' said Furlong. ``We're talking about something that's going to be a few years in unwinding all the issues.''



To: ahhaha who wrote (2096)4/21/2001 9:05:33 PM
From: Frank A. ColuccioRespond to of 24758
 
Re: "Fire the bastards."

Did you write this piece?:
-----

"AT&T TO CUT WORKFORCE 120 PERCENT"

siliconinvestor.com



To: ahhaha who wrote (2096)4/22/2001 1:02:33 PM
From: FR1Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 24758
 
It seems there is a lot of discussion about how ATT is going to step in and clean house. When is this going to happen? With 75% of the voting power, why haven't they already done it?

What do you think of the idea that ATT simply intends to use ATHM as a utility rather than a real profitable company? It ATHM is making a profit, plow the funds back into expanding and upgrading the business. This keeps C&C happy and helps ATT make cable phone deals with C&C, etc.