Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : SI vs. iHub - Battle of the Boards Part 2 -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Dr.MensaWannabe who wrote (1268)	5/7/2001 12:42:04 PM
From: Tim Luke	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 5315

dr. thanks for your help in explaining things...at this time im very limited to what i can comment on but in time more info will trickle out...

To: Dr.MensaWannabe who wrote (1268)	5/7/2001 12:44:56 PM
From: MulhollandDrive	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 5315

Of course, FACTS should be the ultimate determinant in this regard. They seem to be hard to come by. BTW, I differentiate what is happening WRT to a potential court case and what happens in this forum. 2 hugely different venues. Absolutely , I agree that Tim Luke should have every recourse in defending his position. And as of yet, I still have no definitive understanding as to what his position is in a legal sense. And yes, he has no "burden" to "explain himself" regarding his legal case, although he has expended considerable energy on the "forum" side. As far as any judges dismissal, I based that comment on your description, not Tim Luke's. I'm sure if he gets as far as a courtroom, he'll have a clearly defined case. At least I hope so...if not, let's further hope his attorney is on a contingency basis.

To: Dr.MensaWannabe who wrote (1268)	5/7/2001 12:57:14 PM
From: joseph krinsky	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 5315

But at this point, since the legal action is supposed to have been initiated don't you think neither Tim nor Jenna should be posting about it anymore? Usually an attorney tells their client to not discuss or speak about the case anymore with anyone, because usually what happens is that the client ends up saying something stupid, and damages the case. The rest of the posters remind me of a school fight between two kids, where they all gather round in a circle yelling sht in support of the one they want to win. you know, "kick his ss herbie, or make him eat dirt, louie". Not trying to minimize Tim's side of it, he apparently has a real issue or else he wouldn't have taken the legal steps, but I really think the rest of the posters for the most part are behaving like those school kids. Now that I have probably offended everyone equally, I'll go back to lurking. LOL LOL.