Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : SI vs. iHub - Battle of the Boards Part 2 -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: JustTradeEm who wrote (2723)	5/26/2001 12:41:01 PM
From: Francois Goelo	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 5315

JB, why start an Argument you cannot Finish or Prove?... I'm sure you don't expect that Chart to prove that SEVU took off because of some Longs posting on the Boards?... Message 15857242 1) If I was a Promoter paid to Push SEVU without a Disclosure, in violation of SEC Rule 17(b), would I be using my real name, instead of a convenient Alias?... 2) I believe SEC has been investigating SEVU since early January and that the accounts of most people posting regularly on the Stock have received extensive review from SEC... If I had done anything illegal, would I still be posting?... As a corollary, if SEVU was the Scam claimed by A@P, would it still be trading at the time the investigation must be winding down? JMHO, F. Goelo + + +