SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: American Spirit who wrote (155283)6/23/2001 3:00:47 PM
From: greenspirit  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 769667
 
Article...Another Party Switch...

Will Democrats learn anything from their Virginia defeat?
opinionjournal.com
Thursday, June 21, 2001 12:01 a.m. EDT

You haven't heard much from Democrats about their loss of an ancestrally Democratic House seat in southside Virginia this week because it exposed several weaknesses in their political playbook. They'll need some time to regroup.

Premise No. 1 of the Democratic playbook was that voters were tiring of the Bush Administration and an "extreme" agenda that was out of touch with the country. Indeed, House special elections traditionally give voters a ready way to convey discontent to the party in charge of the White House. Columnist Rich Galen notes there had been 19 special elections in the past quarter century in which a seat switched parties. In only three did the party in the White House win a seat held by the opposition party. The GOP win in Virginia, filling a seat vacated by the death of Democrat Norm Sisisky, is the fourth such victory. The Bush Administration so far has a better record of success in special elections than Ronald Reagan did during his first year.



Democrats were convinced Social Security demagoguery would spook seniors and low-income whites in this week's special election. Their ads said President Bush's plan to create individual retirement accounts could lead to benefit cuts and "Social Security earnings riding up and down on the stock market." Republican Randy Forbes stood firm and defended retirement choices for younger workers. His 52% victory in a highly competitive district should lay to rest lingering GOP fears that Social Security reform is a political liability for them. "If we can win on [Social Security] here, we can win anywhere," is the message Mr. Forbes says he will bring his new colleagues in the House.
In fact, Mr. Forbes's showing outperformed every recent GOP candidate in the area. Bill Clinton carried the district twice and Al Gore won just shy of 50%. Republican Senators John Warner and George Allen both lost the district in their last races even while winning statewide. Only 32 of the nation's 435 Congressional districts have a greater percentage of black voters.



Nonetheless, Democratic spinners are already blaming their poor showing on racial antagonism towards Ms. Lucas, a black state senator. But that won't fly. Democrat Doug Wilder became the state's first black governor a decade ago by winning 55% in the areas making up the current district. Mr. Wilder won both black and white votes because he was a moderate who opposed higher taxes. Ms. Lucas lost because she was a liberal who had voted to raise gasoline taxes and against tort reform.
This is not to say that Ms. Lucas didn't benefit from a large black turnout; Donna Brazile, the Gore campaign manager who so effectively mobilized minority voters in last year's election, lent her expertise to the Lucas campaign. Turnout was 38% of all voters, significantly higher than predicted. Democrats also had plenty of money, a favorable district and their usual kitbag of scare issues. They still lost.

Democrats have to come to grips with the fact that even with all those advantages they will still lose if their candidate is ideologically out of sync with the voters. It may be time for them to rewrite their political playbook. It's starting to look outdated by events.



To: American Spirit who wrote (155283)6/23/2001 6:07:48 PM
From: Thomas A Watson  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769667
 
Dear dear as, >>>>>>"Just follow the money". The first rapist and wifey doing the greed thing.

Latest Clinton Lawsuit Offers Star Studded Cast
newsmax.com
Latest Clinton Lawsuit Offers Star
Studded Cast

It reads like the A-list of Hollywood
invitees to the most exclusive party
on Oscar night.

Barbra Streisand, Cher, Diana Ross,
Shirley MacLaine, John Travolta and
Kelly Preston, Brad Pitt and Jennifer
Anniston, Whoopi Goldberg, Patrick
Swayze, Michael Jackson, Larry King,
George Hamilton, Michael Bolton,
Patti Labelle, Toni Braxton, Paul
Anka, Melissa Ethridge, Muhammad Ali,
Red Buttons, Ted Danson, Jimmy Smits,
Mary Steenbergen, Gregory Peck,
Dionne Warwick, Olivia Newton John,
Melanie Griffith, Morgan Fairchild
and more.

But this isn't the cast of the next
James Cameron blockbuster -- it's the
witness list for the latest lawsuit
filed by Judical Watch in California
state court this week.

The legal watchdog group is
representing Hollywood mogul Peter
Paul of Stan Lee Media, who says he
ponied-up $2 million to bankroll an
August 2000 fund-raising gala on
behalf of Mrs. Clinton's Senate
campaign.

But Bill and Hillary took the money
and ran, Paul claims, reneging on a
promise that the president would join
the board of directors of SLM after
he left office.

On top of underwriting Hillary's
tinseltown gala, Mr. Paul put
together quite a sweet deal in an
effort to get Bill to come aboard.

According to Paul's legal complaint,
the agreement was as follows:

"President Clinton would make a one
year commitment to work with SLM
and/or Mondo (English Inc., also
owned by Paul) in exchange for $10
million worth of SLM stock and $5
million in cash, as well as a $1
million contribution to the Clinton
Presidential Library."

Acting as the official go-between for
this arrangement was none other than
James Levin, the one-time Chicago
topless bar owner who gained
notoriety last year when it was
learned he'd spent several nights in
the White House and pledged to
contribute $1 million to the Clinton
Library fund.

Levin kept Mr. Paul on board even as
the budget for Hillary's fund-raiser
ballooned well beyond what he
initially expected.

At one point Mrs. Clinton demanded
that SLM hire Gary Smith, a Hollywood
producer friend of the Clintons who
had put together their first
inaugural ball and who was producing
the Democratic National Convention
just days after the gala.

And the Hillary fave didn't come
cheap. Smith demanded a whopping
$850,000 fee. Levin promised Paul
that he'd whittle Smith's contract
down. But the pricey producer agreed
to trim only a relatively meager
$50,000 from his deal.

As the costs of Hillary's fund-raiser
continued to explode, Mr. Paul grew
ever more antsy about his deal. Levin
kept him on the reservation by
offering more White House promises
"as a show of good faith":

According to the Judicial Watch
complaint, Levin promised the
following on Clinton's behalf:

* The President?s support for a
Kennedy Center Honor for Stan Lee.

* The President?s support for a
Presidential Medal of Freedom to be
awarded to Stan Lee at The White
House.

* A reception for Stan Lee at The
White House

* An official visit to the offices of
SLM by the President

* A stay in the Lincoln Bedroom for
Plaintiff and his wife

* A weekend at Camp David for
Plaintiff and his wife

* An invitation to the President?s
last official State Dinner at The
White House for Plaintiff and his
wife

* The President?s Participation in
the global broadcast of the Hollywood
Christmas Parade being produced by
SLM

But in the end, Paul and his partner
Stan Lee got bubkiss, while the
Clintons not only took the money and
ran, they failed to report Paul's
contributions to the Federal Election
Commission.

The first grifters' Peter Paul con
was certainly unethical -- but was it
illegal?

Paul has nothing by way of a written
contract. And days after the gala,
the Clintons told reporters they had
no idea he had produced the event.

But that's where Cher, Whoopi, Babs
and all the other Hollywood
gliteratti come in. Paul says that
more than a few on the gala's
guestlist were privy to the plan to
have Clinton join Stan Lee.

Brad Pitt, for instance, was told
directly about the plan. So was John
Travolta. And Hillary personally
introduced Paul's wife to Barbra
Streisand -- telling the Democratic
diva that Mr. Paul had produced her
extravagant fund-raiser, thereby
undermining later claims she knew
nothing about who picked up the tab.

In case all that Hollywood starpower
isn't enough to put this lawsuit in
the middle of the media spotlight,
Paul's complaint also contains these
intruiging tidbits:

"During the event, President Clinton
introduced Plaintiff to his daughter,
Chelsea Clinton. In the President?s
presence and while sitting next to
the President and Chelsea Clinton
during the concert, Plaintiff and
Chelsea Clinton discussed how
Plaintiff had planned and paid for
the fundraiser. Plaintiff also
described his plans to work with the
President after leaving office, and
even suggested that Chelsea Clinton
work for SLM too.

"Also during the course of the
brunch, Chelsea Clinton related to
Plaintiff and his guests how she had
been up late playing 'Scrabble' with
her father after the Hollywood
Tribute fundraiser and they had
discussed Plaintiff?s generous gift
of the event the night before.
Chelsea Clinton described how her
father had considered the event one
of the highlights of his experiences
as President, and his enthusiasm
about the prospect of working with
Plaintiff when he left The White
House."

Chelsea reportedly sent Mr. Paul a
thank you note documenting her
conversation with her dad.

Can't keep mr bill out of the news.

tom watson tosiwmee



To: American Spirit who wrote (155283)6/23/2001 6:09:09 PM
From: alan w  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769667
 
There ought to be a law against someone like you using the moniker "American Spirit". You are one of the most unAmerican Spirits I've ever seen.

How about "Socialist Agenda"?

alan w



To: American Spirit who wrote (155283)6/23/2001 6:15:40 PM
From: Johannes Pilch  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769667
 
The Dems will have a field day with the so-called energy crisis.

If the GOP handles it correctly, the Dems will get their dang butts kicked around the field on the so-called "energy crisis." They should make the accursed Mr. Governor Davis the American poster child for incompetence. Heck, they'd pick up California for icing on the political cake.