SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Elmer who wrote (139270)7/15/2001 8:57:25 PM
From: dale_laroy  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
>If I am correct that AMD cannot efficiently yield large L2 die, then consider the implications of the strategy you outline above. The 512K version will yield poorly and the fallout will sell as value processors. This means AMD cannot have it's performance leader also be the volume leader with it's higher ASPs. At the same time most of their "value" processors will be silicon hogs with higher cost than a dedicated small die and lower ASPs than the Premium version. Given AMD's yield handicap, frequency scaling problem and delayed .13u process, their best bet is to minimize die size across the board and give up hopes of competing at the highend where their K7 design is running out of horsepower anyway.<

Doubling the size of the L2 cache would, at most, double the defect rate. Actually, if we were to assume that 29% of AMD's desktop Palomino processors were to have one or more defects that forces AMD to salvage them as mobile Morgan processors, this should be quite adequate to meet demand for mobile Morgan processors. Yet this would extrapolate to a 50% yield of good processors with 512KB L2 cache. With the shrink to 0.13-micron the yield of fully qualified 512KB Thoroughbred processors could far exceed 50% of the total shippable Thoroughbred processors, even assuming the defect rate of the 256KB L2 cache Palomino is high enough to justify salvaging mobile Duron processors.



To: Elmer who wrote (139270)7/16/2001 7:57:05 AM
From: Mark A. Forte  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
AMD is just a fly buzzing around a horses ass.
Forget AMD. What will happen with INTC tomorrow when the earnings are announced?