Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (139803)	7/20/2001 1:38:20 PM
From: AK2004	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

Ten this is the 1st time you admitted that you can not trust intel :-)) I don't trust Jerry and never did but seems that since amd was virtually giving chips away for free I do not see why 7.7 number is unreasonable. Intel's number on other hand is way off. Consider that Intel made a statement about market share while amd just reported units. It is clear if both stuffing the channels then any claim on the market share is as it can get misleading. Regards -Albert

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (139803)	7/20/2001 1:41:04 PM
From: Dan3	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 186894

Re:if you want to dispute Intel's numbers What Intel numbers? Intel is too demoralized by the collapse of its market share to release any sales numbers. AMD sold 7.7+ million CPUs in Q2 - they announced it, and it is in their quarterly report signed by their external auditors. Gartner says 30.4 million PC's sold in Q2. Maybe gartner didn't count a million or two chips put in machines classified as servers, but since this note is included in the report Note: Data includes desk-based PCs, mobile PCs and PC servers., I don't think that's it either. businesswire.com Face it - Intel is getting creamed. AMD held 22% in Q1, and it looks like they had close to 25% in Q2. And now AMD has entered the mobile market - their share pretty much has to rise even more.