SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: gao seng who wrote (25571)8/31/2001 3:56:52 PM
From: Neocon  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 82486
 
I think the syllogism is flawed, but the basic point is this: justice is either inherent in the nature of man, and therefore rights are individuals to claim, or it is a consensus about social order arrived at by a culture, in which case rights are something bestowed, and, if not bestowed, one is out of luck.......



To: gao seng who wrote (25571)8/31/2001 5:38:34 PM
From: MulhollandDrive  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 82486
 
Hi gao seng...

I really enjoyed this...Thanks for posting it.

billyblob.com



To: gao seng who wrote (25571)8/31/2001 5:49:36 PM
From: Lazarus_Long  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 82486
 
Come from? Why do they have to "come from" some place or thing? We simply decree that they exist - legally.

This is law we're talking about. Law. Agreed-upon rules for the interactions of members of a society.

If the Bill of Rights is decreed by God, why don't ALL governments operate by them? Why do they have a choice? We don't have a choice about being bound by the law of gravity.

If we don't, then the self evident truth that all men are created equal is a lie.
All men are in fact NOT created equal. That is what is self-evident. Some are stronger than others, some smarter, some better at dealing with other people.
Equal means equal before the law- -the law is required to treat all men the same. And that is clearly not true also; it is more honored in the breach.