Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: AK2004 who wrote (54984)	9/13/2001 4:09:47 AM
From: Joe NYC	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 275872

Albert, Somehow, I doubt that the decision to invade Afganistan was made so quickly. Joe

To: AK2004 who wrote (54984)	9/13/2001 4:27:14 AM
From: Bilow	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 275872

Hi albert kovalyov; Russia (actually the Soviet Union) invaded Afghanistan in the face of the Afghanis being supplied by the U.S. through Pakistan. The U.S. will (hopefully) avoid that kind of situation. Another difference is that the U.S. won't be trying to install a communist regime. Current political climate in the U.S. would suggest the simple expedient of killing them all and letting God sort them out. But there is no way that the wealthy parts of the world can allow the festering of terrorist attitudes in the 3rd world. I would hope that they clean out Palestine as well as Afghanistan. From what I'm reading, there is probably not a civilized country on the planet that is not mourning the loss of their own citizens at the WTC. South China Morning Post reports on valor of Pennsylvania crash victims: breakingnews.scmp.com -- Carl P.S. By the way, I forgot to thank you for the link to the Russian version of that article. That's how I found the British original.