Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Road Walker who wrote (55198)	9/14/2001 2:23:08 PM
From: Tenchusatsu	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 275872

JF, <So you would support an attack on the UAE, Qatar and Bahrain because their laws may prohibit foreign interference in their banking system?> If they are knowing holding funds for suspected terrorist groups, they should freeze them or face the consequences. If they know of people who deal with terrorists and provide them with funds and supplies, they should turn them over or face the consequences. Yes, I know it's not as clear cut as I make it sound. But it is now a war, and in a war, it's either them or us. These countries had better become part of the solution, or else they will be considered part of the problem and dealt with accordingly. <Where do you draw the line, what country will you not attack with your retribution?> Personally, John, I don't know where I would draw the line. Yeah, I know, it's a shame, but like I said before, it's a war. I can only hope and pray that the war will end quickly, no matter how remote a possibility that will be. Tenchusatsu

To: Road Walker who wrote (55198)	9/14/2001 4:48:32 PM
From: tejek	Respond to of 275872

<<re: No disrespect for Bill Clinton, but he's not in charge right now. Bush Sr. was willing to invade Iraq over the price of super unleaded (among other "trivial" things like the fate of some country we could otherwise care less about). What do these institutions think Bush Jr. will do over an atrocity that overshadows Pearl Harbor? Better yet, what do they think he WON'T do?>> So you would support an attack on the UAE, Qatar and Bahrain because their laws may prohibit foreign interference in their banking system? Where do you draw the line, what country will you not attack with your retribution? John, well said. ted

To: Road Walker who wrote (55198)	9/14/2001 6:35:31 PM
From: Jim McMannis	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 275872

RE:"So you would support an attack on the UAE, Qatar and Bahrain because their laws may prohibit foreign interference in their banking system? Where do you draw the line, what country will you not attack with your retribution?" Well, that was aimed at Ten but let me ask you this... The US (Hillary) torched a supposed Christian Nation, Serbia, for beating up on a Muslim territory, Kosovo. Many innocents were killed... Serbia never harboured or participated in a terrorist attack on the WTC and pentagon... So now, why do people here get squirrely about taking out a few countries that harbour terrorists that launch attacks on the USA? Seems like a double satndard in the first degree... Can you explain why we never got any credit from Islam for protecting Kosovo and helping Afghanistan against the Russians...? Jim