SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : CNBC -- critique. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Ted David who wrote (9026)10/31/2001 9:54:18 PM
From: bonnuss_in_austin  Respond to of 17683
 
Check this out, Ted ... if you can tear yourself away from the make-up mirror <g> long enough to at least scan the head and lead graph ...

May we expect to see any 'in-depth coverage' or 'analysis' tomorrow on this information from the WSJ?

'Pay to Stay' Bonuses Catch On At Troubled Telecom Companies

October 31, 2001

By ANN DAVIS
Staff Reporter of THE WALL STREET JOURNAL

NEW YORK -- In this year's unforgiving economy, managers in most
industries are expecting sharply lower bonuses. But there is at least one sector
where pay is rising: busted telecommunications and high-tech companies.

This past summer, Steve Stringer was pulling in $1.14 million in salary and
bonuses trying to keep Rhythms Netconnections Inc. from spiraling into
bankruptcy court. He lost that battle, but won something else: a raise. Though
his broadband-services company is now selling off its assets at fire-sale prices
-- in late September it agreed to sell most of its network to WorldCom Inc. --
the chief executive has more than doubled this year's expected take-home pay
to $2.5 million. He also stands to collect as much as $500,000 in addition to his
salary as a "restructuring success bonus," depending on how much bondholders
recoup.

Harry Hobbs's salary was $800,000 this spring as the newly promoted chief
executive of PSINet, a networking company choking on $2.9 billion in debt. In
May, it went into default and filed in bankruptcy court. Mr. Hobbs was hardly
stiffed. He negotiated a $525,000 retention bonus with the company's board
and creditors to oversee the company in Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy
Code and a "deal bonus" of as much as $360,000 if bondholders recover less
than 1/20th of what they are owed.

The pay packages of Messrs. Stringer and Hobbs represent an increasingly
popular trend in executive compensation: Chapter 11 hardship pay. Executives
at companies such as Rhythms and PSINet, as well as several other former
highfliers now in bankruptcy court, including Winstar Communications Inc. and
360networks, have prevailed upon boards, creditors and bankruptcy-court
judges for permission to be paid generously in Chapter 11. Sometimes, they are
being paid double or triple what they made when their companies seemed
headed for greatness. Messrs. Stringer and Hobbs declined comment through
corporate representatives.

Companies in bankruptcy court argue these "pay to stay" bonuses are
imperative to keep mission-critical executives from bolting during the thankless
phase of rebuilding or dismantling an ailing enterprise.

Even bondholders who are facing big losses sometimes view the bonuses as a
necessary evil. "The sophisticated players often build a few million bucks into
their plan for this," says Henry Miller, head of restructuring and vice chairman of
Dresdner Kleinwort Wasserstein Inc. He explains that in telecom and high-tech,
networks are worth less every day that equipment sits idle or customers defect,
so a long search for replacement executives is counterproductive.

The wide use of pay-to-stay bonuses is a shift from the last economic
slowdown in the early 1990s, says David R. Williams, a restructuring and
executive pay expert with PricewaterhouseCoopers. Although some companies
once in Chapter 11, such as Federated Department Stores Inc., used such
bonuses years ago, creditors warmed to the idea on a larger scale after
watching some retail and electronics-chains suffer through major executive
flight.

Today's wave of telecom bankruptcies take the trend to a new level,
restructuring experts say. Now, executives are getting investment-banker-like
"success" fees just to liquidate their companies, not save them. And compared
with most industries in distress, the telecom sector is seeing a high number of
liquidations rather than reorganizations.

Martin Bienenstock, a restructuring attorney with Weil, Gotshal & Manges,
says the use of pay-to-stay bonuses has snowballed in part because entrenched
executives are still cheaper than many professional turnaround experts, who
often demand large "deal" fees to step in. All this comes on top of the millions of
dollars of fees already being paid to investment bankers to run the auctions or
find acquirers.

Executives are hoping to receive the bankruptcy bonuses even in the dire,
post-Sept. 11 economic climate. Web-hosting company Exodus
Communications Inc., which filed for Chapter 11 on Sept. 26, asked a
bankruptcy judge two weeks ago to approve the payment of $2.9 million in
retention bonuses over the first half of next year to about 14 "key employees"
and $14.5 million to all 2,300 employees as a reward if the Santa Clara, Calif.,
company pulls out of Chapter 11. The two bonus programs would double the
pay of several executives reporting directly to the chief executive, says Exodus
attorney Gregory Milmoe of Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom in New
York.

Not all creditors pay gladly. Some of them opposed such bonuses for
executives of Canadian fiber-optic company 360networks, including Chief
Executive Greg Maffei. The creditors insisted on renegotiating some terms of a
bonus pool. The company declined to comment.

Some bondholders are growing incensed by the bonus deals, which, once
approved, are almost impossible to revoke. Chaim Fortgang, a New York
attorney with Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz, who represents creditors
exclusively, succeeded in trimming the retention and incentive bonuses for
PSINet's Mr. Hobbs and other executives by a few hundred thousand dollars
each. "In an enterprise where catastrophic amounts of money were lost, the
notion that people should have to be compensated over and above what they
were already getting is offensive," he says.

Today, many companies in Chapter 11 such as ICG Communications, of
Englewood, Colo., are trying to forestall criticism by ushering in retention plans
for all employees before filing for Chapter 11. Creditors were agreeable to
ICG's proposal, in part because the new chief executive, Randy Curran, was an
outsider. He came from a welding machinery manufacturer that he had
shepherded through Chapter 11 in 1994. At ICG, he is receiving high marks in
the turnaround effort. He recently negotiated a $900,000 bonus if ICG emerges
from bankruptcy court by the end of the year, an amount that comes on top of
a $900,000 salary and performance bonus of as much as $900,000.

Winstar, a New York fixed wireless company with $3.6 billion in debt,
emphasizes that its $18 million "stay bonus" plan approved this June covers all
of the 1,000 or so remaining employees after 3,000 layoffs this year. Winstar
founder and chief executive William J. Rouhana Jr. is forgoing a stay bonus
himself.

Buried deeper in Winstar's motion, however, are details on several other
sweeteners worth as much as $31 million for Mr. Rouhana and 240 others in
the senior ranks. Mr. Rouhana, whose salary is $600,000, is eligible to receive
an "incentive" bonus of as much as $1.5 million depending on how much cash is
returned to banks. A spokesman says the number probably will not be that
high.

Write to Ann Davis at ann.davis@wsj.com1

URL for this Article:
interactive.wsj.com.



To: Ted David who wrote (9026)10/31/2001 10:43:51 PM
From: Intrepid1  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 17683
 
Truth be know Ted, I'm jealous of your bronzed hue. I go from pasty faced to bright red when I look at my night light for more than five seconds. God help me if I ever dare brave the Florida sun.

Now about Joe Kernan's hair ...

best wishes

etc.



To: Ted David who wrote (9026)10/31/2001 11:04:52 PM
From: AugustWest  Respond to of 17683
 
Hey ted, don't worry. In my book beauty is only skin deep.

BTW, I see a lot of beauty in your personality. No I'm not gay, just having a few legal beverages. LOL.

Hope you are enjoying your evening too!



To: Ted David who wrote (9026)11/1/2001 12:35:12 AM
From: Frederick Langford  Respond to of 17683
 
You do a great job Ted. Florida tans are the best kind <g>

Fred



To: Ted David who wrote (9026)11/1/2001 10:25:00 AM
From: Bicycle  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 17683
 
There's a reason for everything people do. Thank-you for providing the real reason you need extra tanning. Without the facts, people speculate, and the conclusions where they arrive are often evidence of less than charitable thought processes throughout their journey.

Bye4Now, FD.



To: Ted David who wrote (9026)11/1/2001 1:49:44 PM
From: HandsOn  Respond to of 17683
 
No explanations necessary Ted.



To: Ted David who wrote (9026)11/1/2001 3:42:29 PM
From: Mark Marcellus  Respond to of 17683
 
So now you're showing the MSFT price in the treasury yield section at the bottom of the bug? I guess part of the settlement was that the government will issue MSFT stock in lieu of 30 year treasuries.

You know, in some ways I agree with you folks when you say that you're not cheerleaders and you're not to blame for the bubble. However stuff like this was, and still is, part of the problem.



To: Ted David who wrote (9026)11/1/2001 5:58:50 PM
From: Yogizuna  Respond to of 17683
 
If I don't wear makeup I look like Bluto on Popeye....

Great post for Halloween night Ted! <g> So can I presume you went trick or treating as Bluto with a nice tan on last night? <g> Did you finally beat Popeye and win Olive Oil's heart??? :^) (forgive me for kidding around here) I also have a breakout problem when I put stuff on my face, even shaving cream, which is why I have used electric razors for the past twenty years or so.... Count Yogula (who went trick or treating last night as a sumo wrestler, with no costume necessary!) <g>



To: Ted David who wrote (9026)11/2/2001 4:12:51 PM
From: Kevin Hay  Respond to of 17683
 
re: Tom Costello has TOO much compression on his voice today.

Hi Ted. Don't know if you can pass this on but Tom Costello's
voice has been 'pumping' today from too much compression
on his voice. I would suggest to your enginner that he/she
shorten the release time at least, and probably lower the
ratio.

had to tell some one..., thanks
-Kevin



To: Ted David who wrote (9026)11/5/2001 11:41:19 AM
From: AugustWest  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 17683
 
Ted, Please pass this note along to Bob Sellers.

Bob,

Great interview with Tim Luke from Lehman Brothers.
I'm really glad he found your questions amusing. I found his attitude quite amusing as well.

I specifically liked when he said their target was $20 and you said "so that's the upside?" he sighed- or was that a condescending laugh from him; as he said "Oh we've had that price on it for a while." and you said "All the way down?". And yes folks, another sigh- or was that a condescending laugh?

And when he tried to explain how/when they would raise their price targets, I really enjoyed that too.

Job well done Bob. Refreshing to see some good "interviewing". Unfortunately, I have a gut feeling they will be upping their targets tomorrow or mid December as he mentioned they(CSCO) have some investment banking(or was that analyst) conferences coming up in mid December.

Again, thanks!

P.S> Anyone know where I get a copy of that interview online? DOesn't the CNBC site generally have them available?



To: Ted David who wrote (9026)11/5/2001 5:54:41 PM
From: Intrepid1  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 17683
 
everwonder.com



To: Ted David who wrote (9026)11/12/2001 3:24:58 PM
From: Ruffian  Respond to of 17683
 
You can't miss on this one;

Subject 52011



To: Ted David who wrote (9026)11/29/2001 12:13:33 PM
From: Don Pueblo  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 17683
 
Ted, you are doing a great job, as usual.

If you get a chance to speak to Greg Hymowitz (or however he spells it), tell him that his lame rant about underwriters not manipulating IPOs was so weak, so stupid, so goofy, and so wrong, that it would have surprised me if he were not a broker.

If you're interested, call ANY broker at ANY firm that has EVER done an IPO and ask them if they "suggested" or "coaxed" or "politely requested" that their clients who were going to get IPO shares try and buy a few more shares on the opening day to "help support" the deal.

Greg will tell you loudly that no broker is allowed to sell shares of stock that don't trade yet (true), and Goldman Sachs is at the mercy of Fidelity. (maybe, but that doesn't stop every single broker who sells an IPO from going along with the Company Plan to Support the Deal. This is all very, very well know inside the industry.)

Greg's lying and he knows he's lying. Now I turn the sound off when his lying little face appears on CNBC.

Keep up the good work, sir!

TLC

P.S. Please say hello to Sue for my cousin, if you would please.

P.P.S. Here is something for Bob...excellent charts...he should like it....

funphone.com



To: Ted David who wrote (9026)12/13/2001 4:49:14 PM
From: long-gone  Respond to of 17683
 
Ted,
While you're doing a great job, and I may not be seeing everything with my change in hours worked, seems as though a bit more balance might be needed. From what I've seen the last of your 4 guests speaking to the business/economic to government/legal relationship were elected Democrats. If possible, it would be better to have on an equal number of elected Republicans and perhaps even an occasional Green & Libertarian (if only for comic relief). Last I knew both Ralph Nader & Harry Browne were still alive, kicking, and available for on-air interview.



To: Ted David who wrote (9026)12/18/2001 4:29:48 PM
From: long-gone  Respond to of 17683
 
Ted,
re: Republicans on air

Thanks.

Next, If you want real balance in economic issues, why not get Texas Representative(Dr.)Ron Paul on air! He is as near a Libertarian as you'll find elected to Washington.

Here's one issue about which you should interview him -
the elimination or extreme limits on the Exchange Stabilization Fund(the E.S.F.). You know what they say in Washington, "a billion here & a billion there & pretty soon you've got real money", well, The value of the E.S.F. is now $34 Billion with NO Congressional oversight & NO disclosure!

Dr. Paul's web site:
house.gov
The Office of U.S. Rep. Ron Paul
203 Cannon HOB
Washington, DC 20515
(202) 225-2831

Thanks again.



To: Ted David who wrote (9026)12/20/2001 2:06:54 PM
From: long-gone  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 17683
 
Ted, wtih all the economic problems currently in Argentina, why isn't anyone talking about this?

"Nuclear power
Argentina's nuclear power program is the most advanced in Latin America. Its three government-owned nuclear power plants, two operational and one under construction, will one day produce over 1,000 megawatts (MW) of electricity. They may be privatized in the near future through 30-40 year operational and maintenance concessions. After privatization, the National Commission for Atomic Energy (CNEA) would continue to control all Argentine nuclear activities and a new regulatory agency created under the SE would monitor the operation of the plants."

ita.doc.gov

"Argentina Now *
Renounced their nuclear weapons program, but are still capable of fielding weapons. "
milnet.com

If we were worried about Russia selling nuclear technology while they had their problems, why don't the same worries currently extend just south of our borders?

Ted, please ask the Washington & Wall Street types & a question or two about their selective nuclear concerns?



To: Ted David who wrote (9026)12/24/2001 9:28:20 PM
From: long-gone  Respond to of 17683
 
How long will CNBC keep claiming to be reporters of Business News and have yet to report on & have an expert explain the soaring silver lease rates - now north of 29.9% for one month?
kitco.com



To: Ted David who wrote (9026)1/10/2002 10:23:57 AM
From: Thomas M.  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 17683
 
Now that Jim Rogers is back from his adventure, any idea when he will be appearing on CNBC?

Tom



To: Ted David who wrote (9026)4/19/2002 3:53:58 PM
From: Gut Trader  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 17683
 
Whose the whiney b!!tch ragging on docs for ball game tickets from drug companies

GT@Lobotomies4pleasure&profit.com



To: Ted David who wrote (9026)4/30/2002 10:36:44 AM
From: Yogizuna  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 17683
 
Happy Birthday Ted! (yes, we can hear that buzzing sound in the background at the studio)



To: Ted David who wrote (9026)5/14/2002 1:29:47 PM
From: long-gone  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 17683
 
Hey Ted, hate to sound as if I do nothing but gripe, but how come no gold mining CEO's - it is the winning sector? Wouldn't you expect the stock reporters would center more on the gold mining sector's earnings beating estimates & perhaps news from the sector.

Here's a show idea, Anglogold is deep into jewelry design & selling. Give Bobby Godsell a call <(917) 368-8075- South Africa> and have him on air with some of the GoldAvenue young pretty models showing the jewelry designs... Eye candy is always good for ratings.
goldavenue.com
goldavenue.com
goldavenue.com
goldavenue.com
goldavenue.com
but maybe this one wouldn't be ready for prime time:
goldavenue.com



To: Ted David who wrote (9026)5/29/2002 11:39:59 AM
From: long-gone  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 17683
 
Ted,
I must OBJECT MOST STRONGLY! Please when allowing representatives of any mahor brokerage house, which also has a bullion banking operation, to predict gold price, Please Require FULL DISCLOSURE OF THEIR POSITION!

Thanks



To: Ted David who wrote (9026)6/14/2002 12:30:42 PM
From: Margaret Mateer  Respond to of 17683
 
hi Ted,
haven't posted to you in a while - not since the good ol' days when the gold cartel was still in control. so much has changed! and now the us ceos are on the run - thought you'd enjoy a good laugh -
best regards,
mjm

satirewire.com



To: Ted David who wrote (9026)6/27/2002 12:52:07 PM
From: Jim McMannis  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 17683
 
Ted, you there?
Nice interview with Bill Seidman today. You right about the public wanting jailtime for these crooks. Keep up the comments.
You really making $500k a year like Joe suggested?
Jim



To: Ted David who wrote (9026)7/8/2002 4:36:38 PM
From: Mark Marcellus  Respond to of 17683
 
Ted, David Faber's book with its analysis of the Grubman/Ebbers relationship has become even more timely. If it doesn't happen on SB first, how about giving David a few minutes of your show tomorrow to review the Grubman testimony in detail.

BTW, as an aside to the thread, Faber's book is excellent.



To: Ted David who wrote (9026)7/9/2002 1:56:58 PM
From: MulhollandDrive  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 17683
 
psssst...Ted...

you might want to check into this.

(note the replies)

Message 17711528



To: Ted David who wrote (9026)7/29/2002 10:16:21 AM
From: long-gone  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 17683
 
Ted, TELL management they should fire that damned Pisanni & he should be forced to take his anti-gold agenda DOWN THE ROAD! Today he reported "Gold is down"

HE LIED!
bulliondesk.com shows gold slightly higher as does, Kitco, as does INO!
quotes.ino.com
I care not if he manipulates his favorites higher, I simply demand accuracy in reporting!



To: Ted David who wrote (9026)8/14/2002 8:53:52 AM
From: long-gone  Respond to of 17683
 
businessreport.co.za



To: Ted David who wrote (9026)8/14/2002 11:21:54 AM
From: Jeff Jordan  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 17683
 
Ted,

I don't know much slang but, isn't "shwagg" low grade pot?

speaking of POT...maybe just a temporary move but commodities are going higher. Looks good LT.After the drought farmers going to need lots of fertilizer.
ttrader.com



To: Ted David who wrote (9026)10/10/2002 10:31:32 AM
From: Wolff  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 17683
 
Perhaps its time for CNBC to stop its (3) hour Powerlunch, and cover the market with information that helps investors, rather that continuing to run the giggly personality based trivial diatribe, which is more like a woman’s magazines content than real financial report. (not that there is anything wrong with the content of a woman’s magazine) Come on 3 hours for lunch? Oh wait you could tease the last story some more too, tease the story over and over 2-1 ratio of tease time to story time, yesterday CNBC spent 20 minutes on whether Americans are too fat, shameful…..but I digress.......



To: Ted David who wrote (9026)11/14/2002 12:42:10 AM
From: Jon Koplik  Respond to of 17683
 
Ted -- re : Jackie Mason / Wall Streeters "we expected that" -- I just noticed today's WSJ write-up of action in the gold futures market.

Note the part I put in bold print.

Jon.

*********************************

COMMODITIES

Gold Futures Decrease Sharply As Iraq Accepts U.N. Resolution

By GAVIN MAGUIRE
OsterDowJones Commodity News

NEW YORK -- Gold prices on the Commodity
Exchange division of the New York Mercantile
Exchange fell sharply after large speculators bailed out
on news of Iraqi President Saddam Hussein's
acceptance of a United Nations resolution that will
return arms inspectors to the country.

Those speculators recently bought gold as a haven asset
on concerns of a potential military confrontation with
Iraq, which is accused of pursuing development of
nuclear, biological and chemical weapons. The U.N.
resolution requires Iraq to reveal and dismantle those
programs and to admit inspectors to check its
compliance.

The December contract dropped $5.80 to $318.90 a
troy ounce.

Gold prices had risen during recent days on interest
from the speculative community and climbed from the
$317.50 region Nov. 6 to six-week highs of $325.40 on
Wednesday morning before the Iraq resolution
announcement.

While the gains made late last week were against the
backdrop of a weakening U.S. dollar and jittery stock
markets -- traditionally supportive factors for gold --
the price progress made over recent days coincided with a more stable showing by the dollar and stock
markets.

This convinced dealers that the latest buying interest seen was predominantly of the haven variety that bore
less consideration of the actual price of gold than of the potential impact any conflagration in Iraq would have
on other markets.

This in turn spurred short-term traders to sell gold into the
recent gold-price strength in the expectation that, should Iraq
eventually bow to international pressure and military action be
avoided, those speculators who bought gold as a haven would
exit the gold market and allow prices to drop back to lower
levels at which previous sales could be replaced at a profit.

The December gold contract began Wednesday firmly on
continued speculative buying, but steady selling from short-term
traders responding to the firmer tone of the U.S. dollar relative
to other currencies and the resilience of the stock markets
brought upside progress to a halt around $325 to $325.50.

The surprise acceptance announcement by Iraq then promptly
reversed the actions of the speculative players, with sell orders
swiftly saturating the market and driving December futures back
to the $323.50 region.

Short-term traders then entered the fray and sold aggressively
alongside the speculators.

Leonard Kaplan, president of precious-metals trading and consulting
firm Prospector Asset Management, claimed the price slide had been widely expected.


"The large speculators have been big buyers in recent days even though the U.S. dollar and stock markets have
been fairly stable, so we in the trade were just selling right into them and letting the funds buy as much as they
could handle," he said.

In other commodity markets:

CRUDE OIL: Nymex prices fell on Iraq's acceptance of the U.N. resolution. The December contract dropped
71 cents to $25.19 a barrel. The initial fall was caused by selling from speculators who had bet that Iraq would
reject U.N. terms.

SUGAR: World raw-sugar prices sank to the lowest levels in a month and a half on the Coffee, Sugar &
Cocoa Exchange as funds and other speculators were forced to sell futures they purchased previously. The
March contract dropped 0.31 cent to 6.75 cents a pound.

Write to Gavin Maguire at gmaguire@osterdowjones.com

Updated November 13, 2002 9:43 p.m. EST

Copyright © 2002 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.



To: Ted David who wrote (9026)12/19/2002 11:31:40 AM
From: long-gone  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 17683
 
Ted,
Favor?
speak / report on the Blanchard Vs. ABX + JPM gold price manipulation suit. If one listened to only market reporting they would have thought yesterday's gold price move was first a war / dollar story and at a distant 2nd reduced exploration / future production story. Blanchard is perhaps the single most respected name in coin / bullion sales & well over 20 years old. This is not a lunatic fringe story.

thanks for pushing honesty in the media.



To: Ted David who wrote (9026)12/27/2002 2:26:14 PM
From: Wolff  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 17683
 
Market getting hammered, CNBC covering the Cloning story, good thing eh? As that story will really effect the market, yesterday they cover the Lotto winner, and give advice on what to to when you win 300Million. The starts teasing for about 5 times, the next big story, "What Kind of Champagne to get, for New Year's day"

With exception of Ted David, I think CNBC has totally given up on serious Market focused journalism during trading hours. CNBC must get more advertisers for Market Clowns rather than real coverage.

It would be funny if it were not so sad to watch.

BTW IMHO FWIW : Art Cashin the last straight talking and honest market commentary on CNBC



To: Ted David who wrote (9026)1/22/2003 10:28:14 AM
From: benchpress550  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 17683
 
Hello Ted
Message 18474155



To: Ted David who wrote (9026)3/18/2003 3:54:08 PM
From: Mark Marcellus  Respond to of 17683
 
Ted (or any other budding Fed experts) you and Lyle Gramley lost me during that interview on the Fed and interest rates. Why would a 1/4 per cent rate cut mean less at the current lower levels? At the current low rates, going down a quarter would be a much bigger deal on a percentage basis than it would be at higher levels.



To: Ted David who wrote (9026)6/12/2003 11:39:18 AM
From: AugustWest  Respond to of 17683
 
LOL! Hey Ted, I think I'm in love with Sylvia reporting from Germany!

As soon as she said she didn't wash WRT her tattoo, she stole my heart<GGGG>
Hey what more could a wharf rat ask for?!
Cheers!



To: Ted David who wrote (9026)6/12/2003 11:45:18 AM
From: Yogizuna  Respond to of 17683
 
Hope your injured thumb is coming along nicely Ted.



To: Ted David who wrote (9026)6/13/2003 1:53:11 PM
From: electrodude  Respond to of 17683
 
New fan thread to discuss Michelle

Subject 54043



To: Ted David who wrote (9026)1/13/2004 10:03:03 PM
From: james-rockford  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 17683
 
All right Ted David, start dumping all your stocks. He doesn't post here any more, he's probably intimidated by the collective acumen on this thread (with myself being the head genius of course):

CNBC Tightens Rules on Stock Ownership

By Associated Press

January 13, 2004, 4:41 PM EST

NEW YORK -- CNBC, the financial cable TV network owned by General Electric Co., has tightened its rules for its employees and their families on owning stocks and bonds.

CNBC currently allows employees to own individual stocks and bonds as long as they keep them for at least four months. In addition, reporters, editors and management had extra limitations including a requirement that any transaction of 500 shares or more, or with a value of $20,000 or more, be approved by the company's legal department.

The company also conducted random audits and required on-air personalities to disclose any personal stock holdings whenever they mentioned the company on air. Speculative trades such as short-selling were also prohibited.

Under the new rules, CNBC will require its news staff and management to either liquidate all holdings of individual stocks and bonds by next Jan. 1 or place them in a blind trust. The new rules will also apply to spouses, dependents and relatives of CNBC employees who live in the same household.

The employees will continue to be allowed to hold index funds and other kinds of mutual funds and stock in CNBC's parent company GE as long as it is part of a company investment plan.

"CNBC's reputation for integrity is paramount to what we do and is key to our viewers. We continually work to set the highest possible standards in everything we do which is our role as the industry leader," CNBC spokeswoman Amy Zelvin said Tuesday.

Copyright © 2004, The Associated Press