SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Zeev's Turnips - No Politics -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: scott_jiminez who wrote (2671)11/2/2001 6:33:02 AM
From: Justa Werkenstiff  Respond to of 99280
 
Scott: Next time, you might consider trying to make your case on KLIC (as you do just fine) without the underlying caustic and insulting tone which seems totally out of place and undeserved. Good grief, Zeev just offered his thoughts on KLIC and you offered yours (thank you) and why not just leave it at that.

I would not want to short KLIC either on a risk adjusted basis. But I will not hold Zeev's opinion against him on a personal level.



To: scott_jiminez who wrote (2671)11/2/2001 7:01:51 AM
From: Qualified Opinion  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 99280
 
Scott, did you take any profits during the recent pump and dump of the semi-equip. group ?

Do you understand KLIC's fundamentals and long term outlook ?

Do you know why ASML bought SVGI and not KLIC ?



To: scott_jiminez who wrote (2671)11/2/2001 8:16:55 AM
From: Zeev Hed  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 99280
 
Scott, are you forecasting KLIC at $40 by March 2002? As for the analysis I presented, it is, as usual, just a 60% probability. As for the risk, it is limited to exactly $1.70 or 10% (actually only 8% since the stock was trading at 17.30 when I suggested that as a short). As for the expected decline it is to the range of $12.5 to $14.5 not outside the realm of the November/December 2000 decline from $21.09 (11/17) to $15.75 (12/15). Actually, your example strengthen my argument (you would have seen that if you quoted the volume figures), since on 11/17 we indeed had a huge volume spike (to 2.5 MM shares) that was almost 4 to 5 times the volume KLIC usually traded during that period (around .5 MM shares) signaling the end of that first move up and coincided with the then "peak price". (check for "Turnips corollary" relative to price and volume cited on this thread during this week).

Zeev



To: scott_jiminez who wrote (2671)11/2/2001 9:16:25 AM
From: waverider  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 99280
 
Wow. Let's revisit this post in 30 days.

wr



To: scott_jiminez who wrote (2671)11/2/2001 12:07:06 PM
From: Larry Brubaker  Respond to of 99280
 
1999-March 2000 was the peak of the tech. stock bubble. You are unlikely to see the valuations reached during that bubble again in your life.



To: scott_jiminez who wrote (2671)7/27/2002 9:35:10 AM
From: Zeev Hed  Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 99280
 
Scott, KLIC has now breached $6 half of what my outrageous low target of $12 was, now I think it is becoming a value stock, not at $17 plus when you posted your invective post. I hope you had a stop in place.

Zeev