SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : The Donkey's Inn -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Patricia Trinchero who wrote (1189)11/27/2001 2:01:36 PM
From: Karen Lawrence  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 15516
 
Patricia:

18 KNOWN cases in the last 100 years.... As I wrote in another post, despite the modern technological advances, it took doctors a week to discover the first victim had anthrax. They specifically looked for it, something not done before 911. One hundred years ago what did doctors know? They were doing autopsies, then without washing their hands, they would deliver babies and both mom and baby would die. Without specifically looking for anthrax, it goes undiagnosed and mimics respiratory failure, which in the elderly, is expected.

Yes, it could be a criminal act, random? family tired of waiting for her estate? an annoyed hairdresser? Why her...



To: Patricia Trinchero who wrote (1189)11/27/2001 2:22:59 PM
From: Karen Lawrence  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 15516
 
Patricia:

BTW..Medicine plays odds and uses statistics? A friend of mine was churning numbers to show how effective the war on drugs was/is. Oops, it was not, and the agencies that wanted these stats tried to get her to skew the numbers to reflect the answer they wanted. That's how stats work.