SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Understanding Islam -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: DukeCrow who wrote (708)12/4/2001 7:34:31 PM
From: DukeCrow  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 2926
 
This is in response to this post:
Message 16654298

I'll address these two verses first.

<< 002.191
PICKTHAL
And slay them wherever ye find them, and drive them out of the places whence they drove you out, for persecution is worse than slaughter. And fight not with them at the Inviolable Place of Worship until they first attack you there, but if they attack you (there) then slay them. Such is the reward of disbelievers.

002.193
PICKTHAL
And fight them until persecution is no more, and religion is for Allah. But if they desist, then let there be no hostility except against wrong-doers. >>

There is a very simple explanation for these verses, but it requires not pulling the verses out of context. Thus, I will write the translation of verses 190-193.

(190) And fight in God's cause against those who wage war against you, but do not commit aggression -- for, verily, God does not love aggressors. (191) And slay them wherever you may come upon them, and drive them away from wherever they drove you away -- for oppression is even worse than killing. And fight not against them near the Inviolable House of Worship unless they fight against you there first; but if they fight against you, slay them: such shall be the recompense of those who deny the truth.

(192) But if they desist -- behold, God is much-forgiving, a dispenser of grace.

(193) Hence, fight against them until there is no more oppression and all worship is devoted to God alone; but if they desist, then all hostility shall cease, save against those who [wilfully] do wrong.

It seems to me that these verses when taken in context are simply a commentary on waging war in self-defense against an aggressor. You must see something in these verses which I don't see.

Now the next verse.

<< 009.005
PICKTHAL
Then, when the sacred months have passed, slay the idolaters wherever ye find them, and take them (captive), and besiege them, and prepare for them each ambush. But if they repent and establish worship and pay the poor-due, then leave their way free. Lo! Allah is Forgiving, Merciful. >>

This is from Surah At-Tawbah whose topic is a continuation of the previous Surah Al-Anfal. These two surahs are largely devoted to problems of war and treaties between the believers and unbelievers.

The verse which is quoted, when read in conjunction with the two preceeding verses, relates to warfare already in progress with people who have become guilty of a breach of treaty obligations and of aggression.



To: DukeCrow who wrote (708)12/4/2001 7:39:25 PM
From: uu  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 2926
 
DukeCrow:

I thank you for your comments. You are the first Muslim who really has taken the time to elaborate and explain some of the questons raised without running away. I, do however, still have a number of issues that I will present at a later time as I do not have the time at this precise moment.

I do really appreciate your kind and prompt response.

Also I would like to know your opinion of Hadith, and how you view it.

Best Regards,



To: DukeCrow who wrote (708)12/4/2001 10:00:09 PM
From: IN_GOD_I_TRUST  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 2926
 
DukeCrow,

You said, "Now, some might try to say that I'm dodging the question by going to an outside source (the Prophet's teachings) to more fully explain the above verse on beating ones wife. However, there is nothing further from the truth. The Prophet's teachings are extremely important in guiding a Muslim as to how one should live their life. And, in this case, it helps to set the degree and circumstances of something which otherwise could be misinterpreted."

I agree with you 100%! As a matter of fact, one must use the Hadith (The Hadith, which is a record of the words and deeds of Muhammad, is also viewed by Muslims as inspired. Next to the Quran, it is the most important source of Islamic Law. It's teachings are regarded as binding on all Muslims, for those who do not know!) to complete the teachings of the Qu'ran. In my study of the Qu'ran, I found the Hadith MUST be read, as the Hadith completes the Qu'ran.

Now I wouldn't of brought this up if the thread hadn't gone here. But now that thread took this here, and you made the statement above, we have to seriously consider other teachings in the Hadith, to make an informed decision whether we should believe in its authority or not! (This is really uncomfortable for me to talk about, but these are in the Hadith, and really jumped out at me! I really am sincere in trying to understand Muhammad teachings and these verses! And for some reason, out of many verses I can bring up, these struck me in the past!)

These are some verses I studied with another Muslim that struck me in the Hadith, that we could not get definitive answers for:

Sahih Bukhari

Volume 1, Book 4, Number 215:
Narrated Ibn 'Abbas:

Once the Prophet, while passing through one of the grave-yards of Medina or Mecca heard the voices of two persons who were being tortured in their graves. The Prophet said, "These two persons are being tortured not for a major sin (to avoid)." The Prophet then added, "Yes! (they are being tortured for a major sin). Indeed, one of them never saved himself from being soiled with his urine while the other used to go about with calumnies (to make enmiy between friends). The Prophet then asked for a green leaf of a date-palm tree, broke it into two pieces and put one on each grave. On being asked why he had done so, he replied, "I hope that their torture might be lessened, till these get dried."

Volume 1, Book 4, Number 234:
Narrated Abu Qilaba:

Anas said, "Some people of 'Ukl or 'Uraina tribe came to Medina and its climate did not suit them. So the Prophet ordered them to go to the herd of (Milch) camels and to drink their milk and urine (as a medicine). So they went as directed and after they became healthy, they killed the shepherd of the Prophet and drove away all the camels. The news reached the Prophet early in the morning and he sent (men) in their pursuit and they were captured and brought at noon. He then ordered to cut their hands and feet (and it was done), and their eyes were branded with heated pieces of iron, They were put in 'Al-Harra' and when they asked for water, no water was given to them." Abu Qilaba said, "Those people committed theft and murder, became infidels after embracing Islam and fought against Allah and His Apostle ."

These two really struck me as Muhammad drew a fine line in his teachings about urine. (I know he was a camel caravan driver, so he knew a lot about camels. But why would he include this in such an important book as the Hadith, the book that completes the Qu'ran? It seems now people have to weigh these verses with more substantial, important verses! I have always been confused by this!) Why are we forced to study about urine?

In the first case, a person was being tortured after death because he soiled himself with urine. In the second case, Muhammad instructed people to drink camel urine for medicinal purposes. That's a fine line don't you think, a person being punished in the afterlife for being soiled with his urine, while in the other case some one can drink camel urine and be healed. Is the distinction between the camel urine and the human urine? (I know this seems like a joke to some, or a mockery, but if Muhammad taught this, shouldn't we understand it and it take it very seriously? Muhammad is the Messenger (Prophet) of God to the Muslims!) Should we consider drinking camel urine as medicine if Muhammad said so?

Volume 4, Book 54, Number 516:
Narrated Abu Huraira:

The Prophet said, "If anyone of you rouses from sleep and performs the ablution, he should wash his nose by putting water in it and then blowing it out thrice, because Satan has stayed in the upper part of his nose all the night."

Did Muhammad really think Satan stays in people noses at night?

I could go on, but this is enough! I really had major issues in studying the Hadith when I saw these teachings as I truly thought they didn't seem too important when studying matters of God. Maybe I am wrong and I should take this stuff more seriously, I don't know! But then I figured I was doing an extensive study of Islam, and figured I should try to find out the answers to the above Hadith verses, as difficult that it is for me.

But again, the Hadith completes the Qu'ran, and you need both for a full understanding of Islam. So the Hadith, and these teachings are hard to avoid. And in your opinion, (and in mine) we have to take them seriously.

Sorry for the awkward nature of the post! But I have studied these verses before with another Muslim and got no answers. Maybe you can help me or point me in the right direction ....

God Bless,
IGIT



To: DukeCrow who wrote (708)12/4/2001 11:46:52 PM
From: uu  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 2926
 
DukeCrow:

First of all and once again I thank you for your response to the verse on Wife beating.

I would like to make a few general points (which I hope you would respond) before getting into the specifics.

From your explanation of the verse in question I have made the following observations:

1) Is that a fair statement to make that unless one truly understands the Arabic language, one can not understand what God meant to say through his words in Quran. I am saying this because at the beginning of your post you state the following:

”I am using Muhammad Asad's translation of the Qur'an, as I feel it is one of the most thorough, complete, and concise English explanations of the Qur'an I have read.)

I assume Muhammad Asad is a scholar who knows the Arabic and English language well. Yet literally every translation of Quran I have come across (including the one provided by the The Institute of Islamic and Arabic Sciences in America iiasa.org
And the Islamic Affairs Department of The Royal Embassy of Saudi Arabia iad.org) differe greatly from what Mr. Asad’s version of Quran.. And the interesting part is that all those translations very much imply the same thing while Mr. Asad’s translation is somewhat different in tone.

2) Quran is claimed to be a timeless book from God for all human beings of all cultures, languages, and nations on this planet. If people like myself, and many others (including Muslims) do not know the Arabic language well (as you do) how can we come to understand what Quran talks about? Furthermore even after understanding it how can we avoid misinterpreting it? There is a fine line in understanding a set of words and statement, and then interpreting those set of words and statements and put them in a context? Do you see my point?

I am sure there are not many knowledgable people like you (or Mr. Asad) around on this planet to explain matters clearly to potential Muslims and/or non-Muslims who misunderstand the verses as explained to them by others. Therefore and in all seriousness how can one truly understand what Quran means to imply and to understand it properly? Should the word of God be that complicated to comprehend and to understand?

3) In short and based on your post I get a feeling that the concept of beauty is in the eyes of the be holder applies to Quran. In otherwords, Quran is open for interpretation by many people in many different ways. Logically however, anything that is open for interpretation is not pure as I am sure you also agree with this. Therefore and based on the assumption that God is pure and flawless, how can one attribute Quran to be the word of God since it (Quran) is not flawless due to it being open to different interpretations?

Anyway, in order to avoid having a lengthy post and before getting into the speicifics of the translation you have provided, I appreciate it very much if you would clear the above questions for me so I avoid matters that need not be questioned or concerned about.

Also I would like very much to know about your opinion in the book of Hadith and whether you consider that as a reliable source that can help one to understand Quran?

And once again I appreciate it very much for your help in helping me understand Islam.

Best Regards,



To: DukeCrow who wrote (708)12/13/2001 12:54:40 PM
From: Grashopper  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 2926
 
i HOPE NOONE WILL BE OFFENDED BY THIS QUESTION.A SUICIDE BOMBER APPARENTLY BELIEVES HE WILL ENTER HEAVEN AND RECEIVE 72 VIRGINS.....So my question is why 72?? DOES THE NUMBER 72 HAVE A MEANING OR SIGNICANCE..SECONDLY SUPPOSE THE PERSON IS A WOMAN.....DOes SHE GET 72 MALE VIRGINS?