Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: wanna_bmw who wrote (154646)	1/10/2002 11:23:56 AM
From: Charles Gryba	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 186894

wbmw, quick question for you or anyone else who knows. Am I to assume that the difference between FD and PD is in the wafer manufacturing or are there other changes that have to be made to produce cpus for those two different kinds of SOI? Basically, what I am getting at is that if Intel is correct, what's to prevent everyone else from switching wafers to FD wafers when they become available. p.s. Who manufactures FD wafers?

To: wanna_bmw who wrote (154646)	1/10/2002 12:09:01 PM
From: fingolfen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

It looks very promising for Intel's process roadmap. Also note that the transistors tested had 50nm gates, which is close to where they want them for the .09u node. Wow... that's a nice article... where'd you find it!?!??? Looks very promising. Here's hoping 300mm thin SOI wafers appear quickly on the horizon...