SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : The ENRON Scandal -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: pompsander who wrote (48)1/11/2002 12:04:40 AM
From: pompsander  Respond to of 5185
 
Jan. 10, 2002, 10:52PM
Lay hinted bailout, White House reveals
By DAVID IVANOVICH
Copyright 2002 Houston Chronicle Washington Bureau

WASHINGTON -- Enron Chairman Ken Lay called two Bush Cabinet secretaries at critical junctures in the company's collapse, warning them about Enron's financial woes and raising the notion of a bailout, the White House revealed Thursday.

But Treasury Secretary Paul O'Neill and Commerce Secretary Donald Evans opted not to intervene -- and also chose not to tell President Bush about the calls, White House spokesman Ari Fleischer said.

These revelations helped fan what was already a major embarrassment for the Bush administration into a political firestorm. By the end of the day Thursday, the political pundits were beginning to brand the Enron probe "Bush's Whitewater."

For weeks, the administration has been scrambling to distance the president from Enron, sensing that the once influential energy and trading company was now politically radioactive.

As late as Wednesday, Fleischer was saying: "I'm not aware of anybody in the White House who discussed Enron's financial situation."

But by Thursday, the White House had to concede that the administration had had repeated contacts with Enron through the company's plunge into bankruptcy.

In fact, Lay called Evans on Friday, Oct. 26, a Commerce official said Thursday.

But Evans was out of the office that day. On Sunday, Oct. 28, Lay called O'Neill, a Treasury official said.

The following day, Moody's Investors Services downgraded the company's long-term debt rating, an event that sent the company's stock on a slide from which it would never recover.

In that conversation, Lay raised the example of Long Term Capital Management, the hedge fund bailed out to the tune of $3.5 billion by the private sector under the direction of the Federal Reserve.

"Lay expressed to O'Neill ... his concern about the experience that the company, Long Term Capital, had, that Long Term Capital was unable to meet its obligations and was headed to bankruptcy, and wanted the secretary just to be aware of that so that the Long Term Capital experience could serve as a guide," Fleischer said.

But Lay "didn't ask for anything," a Treasury official said.

On Monday, Evans returned Lay's call. During that conversation, Lay told Evans that "we would welcome any support you think is appropriate," a Commerce official said.

"Lay did call these government guys," Robert Bennett, a Washington-based attorney working for Enron, confirmed, but added: "He didn't ask for anything. He didn't ask for any relief."

"But he felt that, as a matter of personal and moral responsibility, that he had to tell these officials that bankruptcy could not be ruled out," Bennett said.

O'Neill and Evans called on Peter Fisher, Treasury's undersecretary for domestic finance, to watch for any effects on the credit market from Enron's fall.

Fisher "came to the conclusion that there would be no more impact on the overall economy as a result," Fleischer said.

As a result, O'Neill and Evans decided the administration should make no move to intercede in Enron's troubles.

Lay then called O'Neill again on Nov. 8, one day before the company announced it had reached an agreement to be acquired by crosstown rival Dynegy for $8.9 billion, a deal that was to be short-lived.

Lay also spoke with Evans a couple of other times about the company's long-troubled power project in India.

White House officials said the two Cabinet members never discussed these conversations with Bush.

There was no need, administration officials said, since O'Neill and Evans had decided not to interfere with Enron's situation.

Bush may have had more than a passing interest.

Lay, who Bush calls "Kenny Boy," has been a steadfast -- and highly generous -- supporter throughout Bush's political life.

Bush said Thursday he has not seen Lay since last spring, when both men attended former first lady Barbara Bush's literacy fund-raiser in Houston.

"I have never discussed, with Mr. Lay, the financial problems of the company," Bush told reporters.

On Thursday, Bush appointed O'Neill, Evans and Labor Secretary Elaine Chao to a special task force organized to examine current law and proposed legal changes to ensure that pensioners don't lose their life savings as a result of a bankruptcy.

Administration and Enron officials alike were at pains to argue that there was nothing improper about two Cabinet secretaries discussing the the company's financial troubles with Lay.

"I want to remind you that communication is not a wrongdoing," Fleischer told reporters during a feisty, highly confrontational White House briefing. "What took place here is, they received phone calls, and took no action. ... If you're going to go down this road, I think it's also fair to say who in the entire town had any contact with Enron -- or phone calls."

Bennett argued that it is "commonplace for leaders of major companies to talk with government officials. What are these people supposed to do, get their information from the Yellow Pages?"

The administration's critics have long complained that Enron and other energy companies enjoyed too much access to the Bush White House.

On Tuesday, Rep. Henry Waxman, D-Calif., released a letter from Vice President Dick Cheney's office, which detailed six meetings between Lay and other Enron officials and Cheney's staff over an eight-month period.

Cheney was the author of the Bush administration's national energy strategy.

Waxman argued that Lay's conversations with Bush administration officials "raise very serious concerns."

"It is now clear the White House had knowledge that Enron was likely to collapse but did nothing to try to protect innocent employees and shareholders who ultimately lost their life savings," Waxman said in a written statement. "I am deeply troubled that the White House stood by and let this happen to thousands of families."

Michigan's Rep. John Dingell, the ranking Democrat on the House Energy and Commerce Committee, said: "The list of problems and problem people involved in this entire, tawdry affair seems destined to grow. The seriousness of this matter cries out for further investigation."

The U.S. Justice Department already has launched a criminal investigation into the Enron collapse, while the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Labor Department and a growing number of congressional panels have launched their own probes



To: pompsander who wrote (48)1/11/2002 12:04:58 AM
From: Mephisto  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 5185
 
"Every single Enron senior management employee should be investigated thoroughly as to what he and she knew, when they knew it, what they disclosed, to whom, and when. Then, every single arrogant individual who had any fiduciary control over those pension funds should be tried to the full extent of the law.

Speaking only to the retirement plan aspects, this is a crime and cannot be allowed to stand. "


Dear pompsander,

Thanks for your thoughtful post,

Sincerely,

Mephisto



To: pompsander who wrote (48)1/11/2002 2:18:53 AM
From: Charles Tutt  Respond to of 5185
 
But is that kind of thing anything new? I think it's been going on for years. Didn't Bendix dump on its pensioners many years ago? I suspect one could compile a list of many such cases. Even IBM raised a furor not long ago by restructuring its pension plan, as I recall.

Whatever happened to the "portable pension" movement? All we seem to have gotten out of that is IRA's, and I don't think many people take full advantage of those -- especially those most at risk of retiring poor.

If the Republicans succeed in privatizing/gutting Social Security, things will get even worse.

JMHO.

Charles Tutt (TM)



To: pompsander who wrote (48)1/11/2002 3:18:45 AM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 5185
 
Some Enron Thoughts...

Tonight on MSNBC I saw some interesting profiles of the current Enron Management team...

Ken Lay (the CEO and Captain of the ship) is still living like a king --> he owns the entire penthouse floor of a famous Houston high rise...He only eats at exclusive restaurants and golfs at private clubs. I wonder how he sleeps at night...? I haven't heard that he's admitted to anyone that Enron's got a serious problem. Mr. Lay sold off over $100 Million in stock options in the last few years while most of his employees didn't enjoy such a huge windfall (that may have been illegal since hundreds of millions of Enron's profits never existed). The same MSNBC show had a segment where several Enron employees testified in Washington about losing virtally ALL of their 401-k's --> some of these folks are well over 60 and have lost hundreds of thousands (and even millions of dollars) since they couldn't sell the stock at an ideal time (like Mr. Lay and his management team could)...I have a hunch that Ken Lay knows MUCH MORE than has been revealed and the buck stops with him. If fraud and criminal wrongdoing can be proven then he should be forced to return ALL of his gains from the illegal stock sails, spend time in prison thinking about what he has done AND do some serious community service. Many CEOs and executives from around the country will closely be watching the Enron investigations...Lets hope Mr. Lay and his team are held accountable for their actions. Congress needs to change the way 401-k's are administered too. A lot can be learned from this tragic company's situation. WAS MR. LAY A GOOD STEWARD OF THE RESOURCES HE WAS SUPPOSED TO MANAGE FOR ALL OF HIS STAKEHOLDERS...??? He made out like a bandit BUT he ruined the careers and retirement possibilities for thousands....What a legacy he is leaving.

Just my views.

Regards,

Scott