Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : VOLTAIRE'S PORCH-MODERATED -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Sully- who wrote (46371)	1/14/2002 9:04:34 PM
From: stockman_scott	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 65232

<<If you are following the thread, it seems that those who dare express the conservative POV supported by factual evidence, are summarily banned>> Tim: The same thing happened to me on that thread after my 2nd post...They sure don't like to have 'a fair and balanced discussion'...=) Regards, Scott

To: Sully- who wrote (46371)	1/14/2002 9:05:29 PM
From: RR	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 65232

Shame on you. Ha! You know where some ties, or maybe contacts is a better word, go back to really, don't ya. RR

To: Sully- who wrote (46371)	1/14/2002 9:57:26 PM
From: McNabb Brothers	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 65232

wstera, Let's see if I can get banned for this post: Message 16909351 Keep up the good posting, and lets hope and pray that someday some of these Clinton lovers wake up and see what he and Hilary really are! By the way I'm for the man that's running for office and not for a certain party, but have to admit that the republicans get most of my votes! Hank

To: Sully- who wrote (46371)	1/14/2002 11:22:47 PM
From: elpolvo	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 65232

...conservative POV supported by factual evidence wait... isn't that a redundant oxymoron? sorta like... polvie's cruel & insensitive remarks to JW ?? YIKES! <jumps in his 4 wheel drive and peels out> -el moron