SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Petz who wrote (155597)1/15/2002 8:10:36 PM
From: Tony Viola  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 186894
 
I expect the IPC of Hammer to be equal to or greater than XP due to the integrated memory controller. At these superhigh clock rates, reducing latency does more for IPC than any other architectural change.

It may well be a 2.7 GHz Hammer that garners a 3400+ rating.


Well, even though the CC was a bit gloomy re the economic outlook, and the fools are mistaking capex lowering by Intel as a weakness for Intel, I feel damn good about Intel's products, especially the P4, shipping in increasing volumes (2X again this quarter) and on a clock frequency increasing roadmap that I have confidence in. This is vs. the paper tigers AMD has, viz., 0.13 Thoroughgood and Hammer.

Tony



To: Petz who wrote (155597)1/15/2002 8:20:50 PM
From: wanna_bmw  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 186894
 
Petz, Re: "It may well be a 2.7 GHz Hammer that garners a 3400+ rating."

I agree with you about Hammer IPC being greater than Athlon XP (in fact, I am predicting 10-25%), but I think you are overestimating frequency. This is just my opinion, but I don't think Hammer will launch above 2.4GHz, and I am putting my guess more at 2.2GHz. 2.6GHz might come later on in 2003, but not at the launch. If AMD changes nothing with their model number scheme, then 2.6GHz will come out to a model 3400+. However, I think that model 3400+ will be based at 2.2GHz - hence a bloated ranking, and hence it will have pressure from Intel.

wbmw



To: Petz who wrote (155597)1/16/2002 12:01:58 AM
From: Windsock  Respond to of 186894
 
Putz - The AMDrhoid mantra: they don't suck nearly as bad as you think.

It explains Quanti-speed and "better than expected" losses.

Get over it.