Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jorj X Mckie who wrote (113324)	2/14/2002 5:16:19 PM
From: JScurci	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 152472

No Jorj, whats amazing is that you have the intellectual arrogance to diss on a company's prospects, technology,market potential, etc. without offering any substance to support your point of view. Then we find out that what does pass the "jorj investment litmus test" is buying gold stocks. Let me get this straight, you can't be moved by the prospects of a company whose technology is not only upending one of the largest global industries out there, shifting important geo-economic-political boundaries and wealth-share, not to mention literally changing how people live - but you are moved by visions of asians scurrying home with "bags of gold". Give us all a break - you must be a cousin of "Dipity-DooDoo- DDuuhh"!

To: Jorj X Mckie who wrote (113324)	2/14/2002 5:26:07 PM
From: limtex	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 152472

Bibi - Ignored

To: Jorj X Mckie who wrote (113324)	2/14/2002 9:39:01 PM
From: sea_biscuit	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 152472

The fact that QCOM bulls react so emotionally to opinions that differ from theirs should be a big red flag. Very true. They are in love with the technology and the stock. What they talk about are mostly pie-in-the-sky schemes and they don't seem to realize that things can go wrong in so many ways when a stock is overvalued and hyped to the extent this one is. I am pretty sure that this one will underperform VTSMX (total stock market index) or IWN (Russell 2000 value index) over the next 1, 3, 5 or 10 years, take your pick. It is so obvious that it is inevitable. There are some people much more knowledgeable than me who are making my case more forcefully. When even they haven't failed to get their point across, one has got to throw one's hands up and just wait for the passage of time.