SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : THE SLIGHTLY MODERATED BOXING RING -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: thames_sider who wrote (2386)3/13/2002 2:07:45 PM
From: TimF  Respond to of 21057
 
I'm not objecting to their detention - I object to the arbitrary decree that they are covered neither by civilian protections, nor by the Geneva conventions.

Its not arbitrary. Al-Qaeda detainees truly aren't covered by either. However their treatment has been consistent with the Geneva convention. If they where abused it would be a violation of the spirit of the Geneva convention (and it would simply be wrong, which I think is probably more important).

Tim



To: thames_sider who wrote (2386)3/13/2002 2:40:35 PM
From: bela_ghoulashi  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 21057
 
>> so little respect in the world at large <<

Honestly, Thames, I don't understand what's so respectable about everyone else.

The rest of the world is no more moral and not a whit less hypocritical than we are.



To: thames_sider who wrote (2386)3/13/2002 2:55:24 PM
From: Bald Eagle  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 21057
 
thames, I think you are totally wrong here. The kidnappers of Pearl would have killed him no matter what the US was doing, IMO. What about the poor US guy who fell out of a helicopter and was promptly executed. Where was the Geneva convention there? The guys in Guantanamo are being given medical treatment for injuries and illnesses not even related to the war. Also, coming from a Brit, after the way the IRA was treated in the internment camps, I really don't believe you (and me, for that matter) have the moral high ground to criticize US treatment of prisoners.