SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: CYBERKEN who wrote (237315)3/13/2002 11:51:26 AM
From: CountofMoneyCristo  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 769670
 
The idiots who waste their time decrying "corporate criminals" were all perfectly happy to have a president who committed the most flagrant crimes in history...

Not everyone who decries corporate fraud is a Democrat, nor did they all vote for Clinton. For the record, I have never voted other than Republican in any election, with the mild exception of one time for a school board - and then only because the Republican candidate knew as much about education as any student at nursery school.

As for loser pays, now THAT's more like it. That's a perfectly fair and reasonable reform I would absolutely support, but this legislation is ridiculous. I would think that this thread, which I would imagine is peopled by not a few Republicans, would be loathe to support the federal government's power at the expense of the states. I thought Democrats - certainly not Republicans - were known for their love of federal power, oversight and control?



To: CYBERKEN who wrote (237315)3/13/2002 12:38:13 PM
From: Mr. Whist  Read Replies (5) | Respond to of 769670
 
Corporate crime is one of the top five problems in America today. I always find it amazing that Repugs like yourself scream and rant and rave when some low-life con artist defrauds the welfare system out of a few thousand bucks, but yet you remain silent -- or even defend the corporate crooks -- when hundreds of millions of dollars are "lost" in modern-day Enronesque shell games.



To: CYBERKEN who wrote (237315)3/13/2002 2:46:27 PM
From: Selectric II  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
"Loser Pays" is the best idea. It would level a playing field that currently has little or no down-side risk for those who bring nuisance or frivolous lawsuits.