Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Full Disclosure Trading -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: robert b furman who wrote (206)	4/13/2002 3:57:44 PM
From: Donald Wennerstrom	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 13403

Hi Bob, A very nice write up of the whole process. I certainly buy in to what you say. I hope you are right about your following statement: <<I think next week will help advance that concept.>> Don

To: robert b furman who wrote (206)	4/13/2002 5:38:42 PM
From: Kirk ©	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 13403

In my experience,buying into fear - when no one knows when the sales will trough is a safer buy (lowest possible draw down of the account). Sometimes the fear is justifited: epets etoys xoxo Enron Lucent? WCOM? JDSU? IBM? GE? AMAT? Some have good histories over many cycles and others don't. I think buying early can set you up for a grand slam if you are lucky and you buy when it stops falling, but you risk losing all your capital. Cary's approach is safer at a cost of lower potential future returns... Safe is usually better but some of us like to gamble... Kirk