Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tony Viola who wrote (163878)	4/16/2002 10:51:37 AM
From: John F. Dowd	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

TV: Informative post. Thank you. Can't see how the 2.4 and above is going to do them any good without RMBS. By the way this point from the RMBS board is of note: Analysts say Intel's server chips are 50 percent more profitable than Pentium PC processors, and shipments may grow twice as fast in coming years as PC demand levels off. 04/16 03:20 Intel's Barrett Turns to Server Chips to Grow Outside Pentium "Server sales are starting to rebound after a yearlong slump. Revenue from Intel's older Xeon chips is beating targets, the Santa Clara, California-based company said last month. Xeon, the best seller in Intel's server lineup, accounts for more than 95 percent of server chips the company sells, analysts say."

To: Tony Viola who wrote (163878)	4/16/2002 11:45:58 AM
From: wanna_bmw	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

Tony, Re: "Note that according to this data if Intel simply sticks with the 2.8Ghz plan for Q4 and misses the 3.0Ghz goal, they will still lead hammer performance by about 10%." Sounds a little too good to be true. I'll believe it when I see it, but at the rate AMD has been heading, it's almost believable. For their sake, Hammer better perform a lot better than these figures are indicating. wbmw