SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Booms, Busts, and Recoveries -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Moominoid who wrote (19089)5/18/2002 5:03:07 PM
From: Ilaine  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 74559
 
Not sure if I should have that in the course or not

Why not? Stock options are part of the real world of being a manager. You can put in something about the ethics of stock options, that you can have a principal-agent problem.

We just had principal-agent problems in our money and banking class, and it was in our standard textbook (Hubbard). I was surprised at how ignorant of such things the others in the class were.

Most students, unless their parents are in that bracket, are likely completely ignorant of it.



To: Moominoid who wrote (19089)5/18/2002 5:17:24 PM
From: Raymond Duray  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 74559
 
Hi David,

Re: Last bit I was reading was on executive stock options etc. Not sure if I should have that in the course

I agree with CB, it would be a valuable addition to the course. Stated more strongly perhaps than CB would, the present law regarding executive stock options is a scandal in the US and has been one of the principal distortions of the stock market, leading to vast manipulations and deceptions. It's quite a tantalizing subject, and one your students would surely enjoy getting into.

I love the image of Warren Buffett and John Doerr going head to head on this one. Off the top of my head, I don't have their most salient quotes, but the argument boils down to Buffett saying that the way that the US tax code accounts for stock options is a fraud, since it doesn't call an expense and expense. And in defense of present practices, Doerr whines about how he and his ilk will be de-incentivized if the accountancy were truthful. Though not quite in those words.

I believe your students will find you far more fascinating if you take on that options controversy than to, say, discuss "utiles" or "hedonics" or whatever the current buzzword/euphemism/diversion is au courant in academe these days.

JM2C, Ray



To: Moominoid who wrote (19089)5/18/2002 8:33:05 PM
From: Maurice Winn  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 74559
 
<But some prudence isn't a bad thing. Burying CO2 in old oil fields as BP is funding the Princeton dudes to research may be the way to go anyway. >

David, if prudence costs an arm and a leg it's not a good thing.

You have to be kidding that the CO2 level increases we've had have lowered pH of the ocean in the slightest. I can't believe that coral would notice.

What are the coral reefs worth anyway? $10 million? $100 million? $1 billion? $10 billion? $100 billion? $1000 billion?

Mqurice