SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: stockman_scott who wrote (31111)5/30/2002 11:51:06 AM
From: Murrey Walker  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 281500
 
Anyone heard from Colin Powell recently..??

Scott, I'll take a stab at this one.

As far back as the gulf war, I think Powell disappointed many as a somewhat doveish JCS.

Fast forward to present. While Powell's presence in the inner circle lent balance to Bush's team, the trend now is not so much diplomacy, as it is stern force. The kind that Cheney and Rummie represent. I don't think Powell projects such force. JMO.



To: stockman_scott who wrote (31111)5/30/2002 1:03:19 PM
From: FaultLine  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 281500
 
I'm sort of surprised he isn't already over in Asia meeting with the leaders of India and Pakistan.

don't forget, according to Rushdie, it's the most dangerous place in the world to be...

:o(

--fl@noRUSHtoDIE.com



To: stockman_scott who wrote (31111)5/31/2002 10:25:21 AM
From: Win Smith  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 281500
 
Pakistan /The weakest link economist.com

The Economist weighs in , saying that someone has. indeed, heard from Colin Powell recently:

Fortunately, war may be less close than it seems. Senior Pakistani sources maintain that the general has already given orders for the incursions into India to be halted and rebel camps dismantled, and that the Americans have been enlisted to verify that this happens. On this account, the general's tough speech is a case of defiant rhetoric cloaking a hidden retreat. There is no doubt that the Americans are actively engaged: America's secretary of state, Colin Powell, is in almost daily contact with General Musharraf. All the Americans have to do is assure India that the Pakistani infiltration will cease; and to assure Pakistan that India will in return offer some form of concession—which could be as minimal as the opening of talks—on Kashmir. What it so impossible about that?

Well, there are still plenty of problems, it seems. But somewhat surprisingly, at least from what shows up around here, the Economistas come down sort of against India in the end.

India's underlying attitude, in short, has looked too much as though it believes that the status quo suits it fine and doesn't need to be changed substantially. Since the status quo has brought it to the brink of war, this is rash. What India should do now is to give the general some incentives, by promising that if he is seen to be cracking down hard for, say, the next two months, talks on Kashmir will be opened. An opportunity to do this will come next week, when both leaders are to attend a regional summit in Kazakhstan. Some sort of bargain seems to be in the air: the task is to bring it down to earth.

Other coverage from the Economist:

The general under pressure economist.com