SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lane3 who wrote (51886)6/25/2002 8:59:06 AM
From: epicure  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 82486
 
For years and years men had to marry uneducated women who did not have the option to become educated. Now the shoe is on the other foot, and not even because the men are forbidden education, they simply don't seem to be taken advantage of it, and so now we will have societal disaster?

It is an interesting article. But perhaps things are not as dire as they seem to be. Maybe women will just assume all those top corporate rolls, and everything will be just fine. I'm inclined to think so.



To: Lane3 who wrote (51886)6/25/2002 10:17:16 AM
From: goldworldnet  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 82486
 
Women also buy more books. It might not be a solution for the gender discrepancy in education, but I have long held that public education should be extended though college.

* * *



To: Lane3 who wrote (51886)6/26/2002 5:16:33 PM
From: goldworldnet  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 82486
 
Another factor just occurred to me. I don't think guys like the "groupy" teams thing as much as women.

Message 17659425

* * *


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News