SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Joe NYC who wrote (85679)7/24/2002 12:07:10 PM
From: wanna_bmwRead Replies (2) | Respond to of 275872
 
Joe, Re: "chips in hands of a lot of hands of hardware enthusiasts could uncover potential bugs in the chip"

LOL. Sort of like a Microsoft beta release?

Too bad spinning silicon costs hundreds of thousands of dollars, while updating a software glitch only requires a recompile. I'd also like to see what the bug report is like for those "beta" samples. What kind of debug dump file could be generated from a consumer PC for AMD to look at and determine the problem? How are the engineers supposed to understand how to fix their CPU when the user reports an application hang? Are they going to ship logic analyzers and ITPs to all these enthusiasts as well?

wbmw



To: Joe NYC who wrote (85679)7/24/2002 12:44:18 PM
From: andreas_wonischRead Replies (2) | Respond to of 275872
 
Joe, Re: It could be a limited "pilot" release, which I speculated in the past would be a great idea.

Wouldn't a pilot launch take the steam out of Hammer's launch? I guess the public (and review sites) would be somewhat underwhelmed if the first iteration of Hammer would be only marginally faster than a Thoroughbred and got beaten by a Pentium 4 (as suggested by the 2400+ rating). So the first impression for Hammer would be negative and that could bode badly for the "real" launch. I think it will be better if AMD will launch Hammer with a "bang".

Andreas