Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Curbstone who wrote (123220)	8/15/2002 10:36:12 AM
From: Dexter Lives On	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 152472

Truth hurts, huh! Message 17878893 Rob

To: Curbstone who wrote (123220)	8/15/2002 1:37:38 PM
From: Wyätt Gwyön	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 152472

Posts that used to look like cogent distillations of some of the most brilliant minds in economics have degenerated into semi-worthless parroting of thinkers and topics that border on irrelevant my last four posts (before this one) each consisted of the name of a paper and the link to the paper. i don't think citing the name of the paper is "parroting;" it is simply providing a clue as to the paper's topic so those who are interested can peruse the URL while those who aren't can skip it. i don't really expect people who are unable to read articles longer than 500 words to be interested in such papers, but all those people probably have me on IGNORE already... i kind of doubt you read these papers or even checked out the links. perhaps you should. in particular, you might want to check out the very fine one called "Equity Valuation Issues." on Smithers' site. then let me know about the "semi-worthless parroting." the articles on Greenspan were directed toward Maurice, since he has commented many times on this thread about how great Greenspan is (while i of course think Greenspan is an idiot). i do not really care to get into an in-depth discussion of Greenspan (nor do i care to post on the subject on one of Maurice's threads), so i just posted the papers with their links. in the future, i will try to refrain from posting more Greenspan articles (and i would encourage Maurice not to provoke me to do so), since it is not entirely relevant to QCOM (except perhaps for Maurice) and honestly, the topic is not nearly as interesting to me as the general topic of equity valuations. but i will continue to post thoughts and links to others' thoughts on subjects such as equity valuation and options expensing, which i consider relevant topics. not that relevance to QCOM is any apparent requirement to 95% of the posts on this board (whether or not my own are included)...