SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : The Death of Silicon Investor -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: E. Charters who wrote (821)9/24/2002 8:35:17 PM
From: d:oug  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1003
 
Does Coriolis Force affects stuff NOT in contact with Earth?
.
The answer may surprise everyone, especially those in England,
as today on t.v. one could watch TonyB speak, and as if on cue
from another dimension a small number of those men seated around
the Central would pop up and rotate for a short second, and then sit down
.
Yes, rotation was alway small but always in the "coriolis-way."
.
Now attached to this popping up of these men,
whom all English citizens know are
"NOT in contact with Earth"
but somewhere elsewhere in politicalLand,
also emminate short burts of sounds
not of Earth, but as if possessed by demons.
.
I must admit until Bob & EC enlighten me with the coriolis,
that i thought these pop'n men had colic problems.
.
windpower.dk
windpower.dk
The Coriolis Force
Since the globe is rotating, any movemint...

d:oug



To: E. Charters who wrote (821)9/24/2002 9:41:51 PM
From: (Bob) Zumbrunnen  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1003
 
I don't know if I just got my leg pulled by an intellect that's staggering in comparison to my own, or if I just got convinced of the real facts by said intellect. I think it's the latter.

Either way, the W. Darling, etc bit is a riot!

Someone else, who has a surprising grasp of things physical and automotive had asked me to verify what you'd said previously and I said it didn't look quite convincing to me but still seemed plausible. Seems more plausible now.

Unfortunately, I know very little about physics, so I can basically follow your argument, but don't know enough to spot any flaws in it if they exist.