Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Home on the range where the buffalo roam -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Boplicity who wrote (9265)	10/1/2002 11:13:04 PM
From: Selectric II	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 13815

Bunk! Who would receive the subsidies? Those with the best lobbyists, of course. Uneconomical trash, only likely to prolong the necessary shakeout. Let the market decide.

To: Boplicity who wrote (9265)	10/3/2002 12:10:17 PM
From: pinhi	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 13815

Hi Bo, would this help QCOM? QCOM acting well. Pinhi

To: Boplicity who wrote (9265)	10/3/2002 3:14:54 PM
From: stockman_scott	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 13815

Some Leading Tech Stocks have been HAMMERED...here's the change in the closing price from January 2, 2001 to yesterday's closing price: SUNW ($25.44 to $2.57): -89% (LOSS) EMC ($54.31 to $4.88): -91% (LOSS) CSCO ($33.31 to $10.05): -69% (LOSS) ORCL ($26.37 to $8.31): -68% (LOSS) NTAP ($51.44 to $7.03): -86% (LOSS). IMHO, the 'buy and hold' philosophy will be history soon...It's a trader's market and A LOT of damage has been done. regards, -Scott btw, I agree with you about 'The Broadband Subsidy' -- I think an intelligent and targeted one could do MUCH MORE for economy than the wonderful tax cuts that we've all started to receive...=)