Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : BS Bar & Grill - Open 24 Hours A Day -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Condor who wrote (1614)	10/31/2002 5:15:09 PM
From: gamesmistress	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 6901

Yes, I'd say you are right about the level of terrorist activity in the US vs Canada. My point in posting that article was to show that no place is "safe" from terrorists, whether Al Queda, Hizbollah, or whoever. Why do you suppose Chretien "declined to condemn" an organization that launders money, forges travel documents, steals luxury vehicles and murders people? Do you think he's afraid Hizbollah might use the information it's collected? "Hezbollah has members in Montreal, Ottawa, Toronto -- all of Canada," Mr. Al-Husseini, a member of Hezbollah's security organization, told CSIS before he was deported in 1994. "Hezbollah wants to collect information on Canada, on life in Canada, its roads and so on, in case there's a problem with Canada." He was reportedly referring to videotapes of Canadian landmarks sent to Hezbollah. We don't get bombed. Hence, we wouldn't feel the same level of terror as you. People in Bali may have felt the same way. I listen to what Al Queda, Hizbollah, and the other Islamist terrorist group say, and I say that no place is necessarily "safe."