Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Neocon who wrote (68735)	11/27/2002 1:02:01 PM
From: The Philosopher	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

Sorry, but I do think importance is subjective. It is entirely a functionof what we consider to be important. The differences between porpoises and sharks may well be trivial to the biologist studying the circulatory system. I dont' know enough about their circulatory systems, but I can see that for a marine anatomy class it may not matter much -- be of no importance -- whether you are dissecting a porpoise or a shark. To the person looking for a good underwater photograph to publish in National Geographic the difference may be irrelevant -- either one may do as long as they make a good photograph. If I am handed two bullet fragments the differences may mean nothing at all to me personally, but to my client, and to me in my role as a defense lawyer, they may mean life or death. Context. I don't think there is a single thing that one can say is always important to every person. Or that has the same level of importance to every person on earth at every moment of their lives.

To: Neocon who wrote (68735)	11/27/2002 1:06:29 PM
From: The Philosopher	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 82486

The differences between porpoises and sharks are important.? Are they important to a Somali child who has never seen the ocean and will die without ever seeing it if his mother can't find the food to keep him alive?