SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : My House -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Lane3 who wrote (3761)12/5/2002 12:39:47 PM
From: thames_sider  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 7689
 
Something like that. I'm not an absolute egalitarian as far as results go, only opportunity. So I'm balanced on the issue <g>

Anyway, Dutch and Scandic royalty is fine. But my model for potential royalty is C.B.Fry, a true all-rounder...
He was a great batsman at a time when English cricket was at its zenith, an international soccer player, the co-holder of the world long-jumping record while still at university, and an outstanding amateur all-rounder. He also stood as a reform-minded Liberal candidate for the British Parliament three times (losing honorably on each occasion), commanded a naval training school in southern England, edited a popular publication called Fry's Magazine, produced several books on cricket that are still classics, flirted with a career in Hollywood and wrote epigrams or translated English hymns into Greek for fun--when he was not talking incessantly or practicing his dancing. - from a biographical review
In the 1920s, while spending three years as a delegate to the League of Nations, he was offered the throne of Albania... now, there's a king.
Apparently he was also extremely snobbish - essential - and a somewhat ruthless competitor. Hmmm. And impressed by Hitler, which these days is not so good (and was not atypical among the more anti-Semitic British upper-class at that time). As Royal flaws go, there have been far worse... and at least he had a higher IQ than lichen.

Good to hear from you. It seems strangely quiet here, although this could be because I've left the moron filters up...



To: Lane3 who wrote (3761)12/5/2002 3:35:19 PM
From: Lazarus_Long  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 7689
 
PDI 70 IDV 80 MAS 70 UAI 55 CDI 50

I'd call the test poor. There were too many cases where either answer was right depending on circumstances- -but no indication of circumstances is given. I usually left those right in the middle.

Now the rock throwing can start.



To: Lane3 who wrote (3761)12/7/2002 11:21:32 PM
From: TimF  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 7689
 
PDI 25 IDV 70 MAS 50 UAI 30 CDI 35

Tim