Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : TATRADER GIZZARD STUDY--Stocks 12.00 or Less..... -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TATRADER who wrote (34272)	12/27/2002 1:29:53 AM
From: bdog	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 59879

Rev. Gizzi, "As I have been saying the last 3 months, we are beginning the trip on a wonderful rally in the silver stocks....HL,PAAS,SSRI, CDE are the place to make money in 2003...BE THERE! Long 19,000 CDE and not selling any until at least 3.25..... " aye. slow train comin. there is a "magnatizer" magnet at 3.26 for CDE... and some other stuff... Message 18374194 it sure is lookin like she wants to go.... chugga chugga bdog

To: TATRADER who wrote (34272)	12/27/2002 11:20:48 AM
From: Smiling Bob	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 59879

Hi Mark Merry Christmas and Happy New Year. Thanks for offering a thread that consistently promotes sincerity, fairness, and true analysis. And also to all the contributors who share their opinions in a civil manner. To the contrary, the only expertise the experts ever offered was in convincing their audience that their views were of value. On occasion, I listen to the morning radio biz commentary from brokerage house "analysts." I rarely ever, if at all, hear them suggest it may NOT be a good idea to go long. Every morning they do nothing but cheerlead and preach the long-term value. They recite historical numbers. But they always neglect to point out that, unlike in the past, 7 trillion dollars vanished as a direct result of corporate and brokerage greed. Everytime they do, they are violating every code of ethics imaginable. The media that offers up these "analysts" are just as guilty. Because they are presenting them as objective investment analysts when they know exactly why they're there. They are salespeople. They and the firms they represent make a living by controlling other people's money, not by performing. If they went on the air and suggested to stay away from the market, their employer would yank them off. They continue to deceive and misrepresent themselves every time they speak. There remains a clear conflict of interest. They continue to practice deceit even today. End of year window dressing is freely practiced. They can show their clients they owned the better performing stocks. But did they really??? Message 18372046 I personally never pursued a job at a brokerage because they had nothing to do with investing. They were just looking for salespeople. A car salesmen isn't handing out bus tokens or suggesting a good mechanic. A real estate salesperson isn't telling you to rent for now. An aluminum siding salesperson won't tell you to paint. America has been fleeced and they will demand more than a slap on the wrist. Retirees who helped lay the groundwork for America's prosperity have been stripped of their nest eggs. Brokers remain great shorts. They need a complete overhaul before anyone should be willing to associate with or promote these names.