Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : MARKET INDEX TECHNICAL ANALYSIS - MITA -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: mishedlo who wrote (15983)	1/30/2003 5:27:04 PM
From: lurqer	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 19219

#1) & #2) #3) Compare valuations with P/E's of 14 to 16 (Fair Value) and 7 to 10 (Secular Bear lows where P/E compression stops). All JMO lurqer

To: mishedlo who wrote (15983)	1/30/2003 5:38:58 PM
From: Lizzie Tudor	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 19219

If that is your big proof, you seriously need to reconsider things IMO. I knew this was going to be your response. Your attitude might make sense if these companies weren't 100-300% off their lows in this bear market, in front of war. You remind me of many bitter bears, for some bizarre reason you think companies aren't moving forward unless they surpass their 2000 revenue estimates or something. Yes these estimates are "stripped down", but of course so are the multiples. If you have a software stock trading at 1x sales, and they come out with revenues increasing at a 12% clip... license revenues I mean which are predictive indicators, then those PS ratios are going to get racheted upwards. PS of 1 is for companies with no growth at the top line. Lizzie