Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : DON'T START THE WAR -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: PartyTime who wrote (10099)	2/18/2003 11:12:06 PM
From: AK2004	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 25898

PT that is why we are sending troops there. It would be much safer just bomb the hell out of them. This chart should tell that currently those children have no future, US is their last hope, IMHO -Albert

To: PartyTime who wrote (10099)	2/18/2003 11:35:11 PM
From: Vitas	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 25898

if you think either side is going to accept that as "analysis" from you, you are delusional the fact of the matter is you've had a corn on the cob stuck up your a$$ since the Bush election and have been maliciously irrational ever since you couldn't even fool yourself if you tried but, go ahead, give us a good laugh: WHAT IS YOUR PRACTICAL PLAN TO DISARM SADDAM?

To: PartyTime who wrote (10099)	2/19/2003 8:16:11 AM
From: LPS5	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 25898

[Y]ou'll find there's a heck of a lot of children who'll be under those bombs...t makes no sense to humanity to bomb so many children, based on a speculative thread [sic] that something might, not will, happen. TigerPaw ducked the below question relating precisely to that issue. Will you? Message 18595927 "In considering [that, allegedly, half of the population of Iraq is comprised of individuals under the age of 15] though, a more immediate issue comes to mind: if you're using this as a reason not to attack preemptively, what would you recommend the child:adult ratio be before we commit troops in a given situation? 4:1? 10:1? And via what logic or calculation does that proportion find its derivation? By this laughable rationale, isn't the next generation of national defense a baby boom?" LPS5