SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: TimF who wrote (167885)4/15/2003 8:00:01 PM
From: i-node  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1576654
 
If a few airlines go under because we stop coddleing them then air travel will continue and maybe eventually become profitable. If we keep pouring on the subsidies then it will also be a losing industry.

With the exception of SW and a couple others, airlines have never made money. They are just too capital AND labor intensive, and they've found themselves in a self-inflicted trap whereby many passengers are flying at prices that cover only the variable costs of operation.

Throughout history, the number of major airlines failures is phenominal. Braniff; Eastern; TWA; these problems date back to the earliest times of airline existence.

I prefer to let the Donald Trumps of the world put THEIR money into them...



To: TimF who wrote (167885)4/16/2003 11:19:46 AM
From: tejek  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1576654
 
If a few airlines go under because we stop coddleing them then air travel will continue and maybe eventually become profitable. If we keep pouring on the subsidies then it will also be a losing industry.

I tend to agree with you; however, if "a few airlines go under" that will be a lot of jobs lost. I am not sure how well the economy could take that lose right now.

ted