Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: LindyBill who wrote (95471)	4/22/2003 2:22:52 AM
From: Doc Bones	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 281500

Resolve of the Prez Not many doubt the prez' resolve, I think. But he could use a little more finesse when making public statements like this: I loathe Kim Jong Il!" Bush shouted to Woodward. "I've got a visceral reaction to this guy because he is starving his people. Maybe it's my religion … but I feel passionate about this. It's enough to make a dear leader cancel his clipping service, and it's not helpful. That's why we have diplomatic types like tekboy. They can lie to your face all day long and go home and sleep like a baby. ;-) Doc@suave.gov

To: LindyBill who wrote (95471)	4/22/2003 2:33:49 AM
From: FaultLine	Respond to of 281500

"Bad boys" from the Dem times fade away, but the ones from the Repub times make comebacks? No, actually I haven't... :o) --fl@thankgod.com

To: LindyBill who wrote (95471)	4/22/2003 10:48:43 AM
From: JohnM	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 281500

Bill, You are getting so far drawn into supporting dubious Republican causes, the next thing we hear you will be contributing some of your bond clipping income to the Senate leadership. I assume you saw this one on Santorum. G.O.P. Senator's Remark on Gays Draws Fire By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS nytimes.com An excerpt: >>In a recent interview with The Associated Press, Mr. Santorum, a Pennsylvania Republican, criticized homosexuality while discussing a pending Supreme Court case over a Texas sodomy law. If the Supreme Court endorses a right to consensual gay sex within the home, he said, "then you have the right to bigamy, you have the right to polygamy, you have the right to incest, you have the right to adultery. You have the right to anything."<<