Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : SI vs. iHub - Battle of the Boards Part 2 -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: mmmary who wrote (4467)	5/13/2003 4:00:56 PM
From: Matt Brown	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 5315

I can't resist you. I think you have the potential to be the next Maria Bartiromo. Maybe you should start off on JagFN?

To: mmmary who wrote (4467)	5/13/2003 4:05:00 PM
From: Bux	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 5315

Mary, I must say, I really did underestimate you, you are not only smart and sexy but also have a nice sense of humor. What's there not to like? Oh, that right, you don't bow down to male authority figures...<grins> Once

To: mmmary who wrote (4467)	5/13/2003 4:12:52 PM
From: Bux	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 5315

It's not just the inequality of which posts get deleted but also how the enforcement is handed out. Since I'm not a bull, one little slip on my part and I'm in the slammer. I was put there for calling someone dense (one time) when I responded to their complete lack of logic. But today there were a lot of much stronger personal attacks against me and while the most vulgar attacks were deleted I noticed that there are still people free to post who made these attacks. These people are repeat offenders and all that is done is their posts are deleted. One little misstep by me and I'm in the slammer with hardened criminals, LOL! Bux

To: mmmary who wrote (4467)	5/14/2003 1:40:27 PM
From: (Bob) Zumbrunnen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 5315

I can see from posts here that it hasn't changed I am of course reading SI and bux's posts. Then you might as well "call the company" and call it "DD". When so much of your past efforts have been to open people's eyes to how to correctly research before making (investment) decisions, it'd be good to set a better example.

To: mmmary who wrote (4467)	5/18/2003 8:36:16 AM
From: Mr. Jens Tingleff	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 5315

Dear Mary and Bob, Just some thinking out loud here from me.... You really have too much in common to be at odds. Neither of you lack anything when it comes to intelligence. You both dislike promoters in disguise, and scams of course. You both have a heart for free speech. You are both very helpful when approached for assistance. Perhaps both of you can do a little bit better when it comes to EQ, at least between the two of you ;-) I like both of you - Though I have to admit that Mary is the prettier one, that is not the reason :-) - Hurts me to see your battle. How about starting over from square one? - We will all win from the energy set free to bet used in better battles. Whit regards to IHUB - The Chairman system is IMO a serious problem - How about a change so that stock boards do not have the chairman's message remove function. I have recently seen many legit posts that was removed by a paid promoting chairman (Jerome). Also the chairman should not have the ability to remove e-mail addresses from the chairmail - And everybody should have the option to list on the chairmail, and the e-mail addresses should not be seen by the chairman and her/his assistants. As it is now the chairmail system is an invitation to illegal distribution of inside information (Yup, saw that too, Highstreet and Jerome). IMO the changes suggested above are what is needed to make it a real InvestorsHub. No pun intended, no patronizing intended - Just with plain kind regards Jens